The metacritic scores show subjective opinions
Nothing else
Not even necessarily from people who played both
I don't think dinosaurs is a genre
And I'm tired of low quality half assed articles
Yet here thegamer keeps on churning
3-4 ads and a Cookie thing I couldn't click the first time
This is awful, recommend finding another site for this
Can we wait until they actually release a game before we talk about a comeback...
I don't hate it
I just think it's a bit aimless
Like you're doing random side quests until story happens
The PS3 ff7 was just a tech demo to show off the PS3 power, nothing else
It's safe for kids supervised
no game with an online social component is safe for kids unsupervised, hope that's clear
yeah, it's why i never trust any reviews for example, if someone wouldn't be able to be negative
Not usually
I know they're not the same
Which Is why I refuse to call it a remake
It's nonsensical and states the obvious?
Isn't that a bit contradictory?
From remastering a game again and selling it full price
You're right
If it makes money it's automatically a good thing
Sure
That's why
Not easy money from people willing to pay full price for the same game at all
You're thegamer
You have no place mocking other people or calling them fools
The cheapest one after it releases
Don't trust blizzard until you see results
Mo manual saving?
Isn't the manual saving already broken and useless anyway?
Slow news day
"thing could be good or bad in this scenario"
can't wait for the "resident evil 4 could be good or bad" article
I'm sorry what now?
Who expected that?
If it was meant to be episodic or an experiment for that, the price should / would have reflected that