yeah me too, i wish they'd tone down the drop rate of weapons and just have them a bit more durable, i'd have a weapon with 120 attack and 5 minutes later it would be at 60
He said it's unfair and takes out the fun? of course people are going to disagree
i agree with the stamina, thought the camera was fine, and most enemies don't kill you in one hit.
Maybe you didn't play far enough to know that, or you didn't play at all, nobody who played much could think it's just one hit kills.
Considering you wrote an article about it, yes, you very clearly could care less.
I don't think the word "should" should be used for this, i don't think they should be hard to find, but i don't think they shouldn't be either, up to the people making if they want everyone to have one or a small group.
for me it's 8 or 10
I've noticed a lot of people don't like 2 but it's one of my favorites, in top 5 if only including main series
Well I've played them all from world at war up and i don't don't know how anyone could say they play the same
I think people have this crazy idea that just because they see a lot of hate for something on the internet that it's what the majority of people feel.
In my experience the people who say something is the same every game are people who haven't played them,
I even have a friend who says pokemon is thesame every game despite the fact he'd never played any of them
"Players in the UK who are waiting for No Man’s Sky release will have to wait several days after everyone else in the world gets the game. "
You mean several days after people in America get it?
only 2 days after Europe, america is not the rest of the words you know?
Yes it is called reading comprehension, maybe instead of using the words you should actually show that you an actually do it.
It would take away from the overall reputation, most games can be hard on higher difficulties, they made the game to be hard, Super luigi U was not made to be a game of a certain difficulty, souls games were.
If people don't care enough then it shouldn't matter if the game gets easier really.
It's not "overly difficult" and you don't exactly have to master it to beat it
Disabilities is much too vague a word, that could range anywhere from being in a wheelchair to having a deformed hand, if their reflexes are that slow then odds are any fast paced game will be too much, should every game accomodate every person?
" some gamers even might be disabled physically or mentally to some degree and not be able to play too hard games, some others maybe just want relaxe while gaming and don't like the stress, rage and pressure this hard difficulty can put on you"
Well it's a good thing 99% of games give this option so they can play any of those
An idea for people who don't like the difficutly,
play something else
many good arguments you just chose to ignore them
You know someone has a good argument when they have to resort to calling people names
i didn't know creating the experience they want to make was bad business, but they seem to be doing fine, i'd imagine they have people much better than you to help them with business decisions
No it wouldn't hurt individual experiences but it would take away the games reputation as being a hard game, instead it would be a gem that's hard on higher difficultie...
just in relation to your comment above
"Ya know what's crazy too. 90% of people who want this "baby mode" havnt even tried it. They just hear about it and now that it's actually popular, they want to be with the "in" crowd, but are too afraid"
Do you have anything to prove than? or even back it up slightly? or are you just pulling numbers out of your ass?
1, Not in development for 10 years
2, I don't know what difference does it make when he talks about it? especially when it was barely a mention and very vague
I know a tutorial popped up on how to do it, but it seemed to be the only one that didn't appear in the tutorial list after.