I actually think it would be better for EA to disappear or at least get back to making quality titles instead of rehashing the same thing over and over(I love the QB Vision and Hit Stick but Damn upgrade the franchise!!)It would also be easier for smaller companies to make great games and not have to worry about being squeezed out by big name titles that take up the publicity.
Dramatically increase!!
100% agreed fenderputty. Who knows what they'll come up with with healthy competition.
I had to get skeptical once he said exciting also. I don't know what GT he's been playing but every iteration has been exciting for me but even more important is that it's been REALISTIC. If i wanted to play burnout or some arcade racer I would buy it but I appreciate realism. And he shot himself in the foot with that "mostly aesthetic damage". I don't give a damn how the car looks. I would be a little pissed if I slammed into a wall nose first and my car handled exactly the same. E...
I don't think so because 6-7 lines it says "Tendered Offer" and I'm sure everyone knows what a tendered offer is.
Even with it being on two consoles you can't deny the fact FF13 with sell a phenomenal amount of copies, easily surpassing that of Last remnant on both consoles. FF is an established IP and one of the game that people bought a PS3 for. Also by the time it comes out(next year) the PS3 install base will at least be at 16-17 million and that's a lowball number, given their momentum already.
This is a tendered offer which hasn't accepted yet.
Wow.
But the counter argument can be made that I can do that without a meter telling me what i've done. Keeping track of it is fun but it's not necessary. You don't need achievements to play through every aspect of a game. Don't mean to argue just playing devil's advocate.
These are nice but I hope the Wii can put out something better than this...
If it's exclusive then it's definitely a blow to MS in spite of everything they've done. But they don't have to steal anything away from Sony. They need to press their base to buy the game which will suit them just fine.
Okay good point. But yet and still, most people would find them unnecessary but I guess do serve a purpose.
No Script for Firefox is by far the best add-on or plug-in of any web browser.
It doesn't make me angry as I long as I don't see it in the middle of the screen for every load or pause in gameplay.
yeah man he's got a point. That's what the ignore feature is for. And I actually found those comments to be funny.
1000% agreed.
I'm pretty sure most people will disagree with you on the achievements thing as it's more like a bragging right then anything else. On Xbox live your right but the counter argument to that would be how many people are going to playing death matches(or whatever the online component will be)online, as opposed to enjoying the main game. On the DLC front it does have more content than the PS3 but the counter argument to that can be you don't know what the DLC is going to be yet so you can't make ...
By strict definition they would be a monopoly since they would control a majority of the ad revenues and there would little to no significant competition. That being said I'm uneasy with any company(even google) controlling the majority of that market.
Verizon can blow chunks. Everyone knows that Fiber optics have been used for a while now. When I saw that verizon commercial I was pissed because they were basically saying they were the only ones.
I don't mind Gamestop trying to make a profit but I do have an issue with them taking money away from the developers of the games. If they resell a traded-in game they get all the profit and that hurts the money that the dev's bring in. I'm waiting for Gamefly's service to get off the ground so I can trade my games in there. Bottom Line: If you don't like the prices don't trade them in.