Square is responsible not SWITCH so now people that irrationally tried to blame nintendo have EGG on their face becuase it is COMMON knowledge that a publisher controls their price not the console/store.
Yeah ZeekQuattro,
You know whats worse?
Nintendo haters having egg on their face. When Square priced the game on the SWITCH people tried to blame Nintendo even though it is VERY common knowledge that the publisher controls the price. And Nintendo pointed that out.
Now they are doing it on STEAM? Digital only on top of that? OLD game, no physical cost, no box art, no microsd like the SWITCH had not even a DVD, and they want 59.99! Blame it on SWIT...
Darthf you said games are becoming more and more like music and should be able to play on what everr?
It is VERY easy to test that. Do publishers always bring digital games to every console.....NO....Why not? Because it they say it would not be PROFITABLE to port them. Port means coding! which costs MONEY. LOTS of MONEY.
What EasilyTheBest? Every halfway intelligent person has to know that a monopoly is not good for anyone except the people that WILL abuse it. The only monopolies are controlled and regulated by the Government to stop the abuse. So are you saying you want the Government to control Microsoft and Sony if they join forces? Because if Nintendo does not control a big enough part of the market that IS what the Government by law HAS to do.
https://www.networkcomputin...
Actually Jukins is RIGHT it actually decreases penetration.
That would be a Good analogy Kribwalker if you say MS is Sonys GARAGE landlord for Sony's racecars!
LOL....just kidding!
I was expecting you to end that with .....for the dying EA. LOL
Because they expect to get booed, more than anything else. They take polls on interest in games and 'goodwill'.
ROFL!!! Not sure if the disagrees got the techie joke.
ummmm if you dont have fiber optics there in trouble according to the 3drealms interview article.
If your wondering why all the disagrees there are people that like 8 better so your slapping them in the face. And there are people that liked 9 and 10 too. If you had said 7 was the BEST and not last good you would not have gotten as many disagrees.
You should try TRAILS of cold steel. It is becoming more and more like the original final fantasy's. And it's S-crafts are becoming more and more like SUMMON spells, this game has it ALL. Even mechs
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
haha I agree even though x was starting to go down hill it it was still good. After X they fell off the hill. Now they are cash cowing off the name of FFVII.
LOL
People will disagree until it comes out just like they did with FFXV until it came out then they was like ops....yeah I wasted my money!
Your being too nice! They are not being backwards they are being CHEAP. In 1998 the new CEO (at the time) said that it cost 4 times more to make a turn based than the same game being action based. This is WHY square started off making action rpg's (dragon slayer 1 and dragon slayer 2) when they was going at of business they released a last game RIGHT before and was saved that game was FF(1). It saved them with sales.
But he said they needed to smooth out sale...
? huh really? Not fare your pulling my leg!
I agree I'd perfer it be a turn based game.
I agree with the overall part of your message. But I'm sure people are pissed about the FF15 reference because of negative feelings on wasting money on that one.
Most jrpg's take at least 20 hours to get into it. You was not even 1/4 of the way through with learning the moves.