Sega makes sense.
It is. But the future can be worse than the present or the past sometimes.
*remaster
They place GaaS as the engine of growth in monetary terms in the industry. I do not know if this growth will necessarily be good or positive for the consumer side of this equation.
We're paying more so we do not run the risk of having a broken drive. Microsoft is trying to protect us from the flaws the bluray reader might have.
Thank you MS.
This list just shows how superior are Switch owners. We praise quality.
I'm waiting for the Forbes article saying how good is for gamers the silence of Microsoft and Nintendo over this subject.
These articles are only praising ff xii because the game was released on Switch.
These questions dont come from nowhere.
It's an option. But there's always a bigger fish. If market dumps, some other can buy you.
Disney.
Nintendo cant do wrong.
But if the icon in the menu is fine I can pay even $60.
The article never said anything about "secret sauce". The title is misleading and borderline lying.
Game is selling better than ever. Maybe some fans are unhappy with the path game took, but business wise they are doing great.
People need to understand that those big companies are looking for short term profit. If you're not growing you're a failure. Games as a Service are worse for traditional gamer but it can expand userbase to unreacheble people. And in the system western countries works, that's what matter.
Wow! Good prices.
If you add Switch to Wii U, PlayStation 4 still keeps first place.
Gameboy wasnt the first handheld.
Só now there's no excuses to developers skip or downgrade games on Switch. It's as powerful as XBox One and PS4.
So... you're saying that the State should interfere in a business model?