the game on the NGP is the exact same as the PS3 one. Case and point, Ruin. Sometimes its not (Wipeout game for NGP is not the same as the one on the PS3) but in both cases you can see the interactivity.
was MS's excuse the last time wasn't it? I don't see why not. Besides according to the suc...erm buyers, its only like 5 dollars a moth. Surely paying 5.83 a month wouldn't do any harm. MS needs the money because all the ads on the dashboard don't give them enough money to upkeep the nonexistant gaming servers.
I just want it to look half as good as the PC version and maintain all the destructibility and chaos I saw.
for Nintendo this time. They have to try and sell the controller (that thing is probably worth $100+) and the console (that is equal if not slightly better than the PS3/Xbox).
I wasn't looking for any advanced machines and stuff. I was looking for tactics and precise coordination that I found in the previous SOCOM's on the PS2. In the main campaign AND in the MP component. They made SOCOM 4 some action game and the MP followed that direction.
Ghost Recon looks like a futuristic version of the SOCOM everybody wanted.
have to give the game a 9. They need to justify there score by giving proof of all the faults that lead them to giving the score they give. Edge's review was just them giving extremely opinionated statements without actually referencing bugs or faults in the game to justify them.
a very weird review. The guy was trying to be funny or something but it was just awkward to read.
Also, the pic is from Infamous, not Infamous 2.
but to the people that are just flaming this game, give it a chance.
I'm not saying preorder it but until I see problems I reserve my judgement on games. (Yes even COD). If/when I see the bugs and shit, then I will join in the flaming.
MW games have always been about the over the top action and all that. I don't know what you guys were expecting to see from them with this one. We all know BF3 will most likely be better but that doesn't mean MW3 ...
they make the story flow better. In MW2 the player jumped all over the place doing random stuff that looked cool. I'd rather be the same guy with the same unit going after one primary goal the whole game.
As for the MP. I hope they take care of the horrendous lag and hit detection that plagues COD games. (Oh and the weapon and perk balance)
it makes me disappointed in Zipper...
stupid comment. I wish N4G didn't alert me to your reply because it has lowered my IQ significantly. What does this cheerleader crap have to do with the PS3? Please don't reply to my comments ever again, and for your future here remember:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_B...
its only trophy data. If you have full infamous karma in InFamous you can get 1 full bad karma level for InFamous 2 from the get go and vice versa with good karma.
Its like they aren't even trying to make worthwhile games for everyone. Its just casual crap to try and get money.
MS should have a better quality filter and only have Kinect games released if they are sure that they will be quality. I think they are kjust allowing anything so they can say in the next game show that they have "X amount of Kinect games on the market".
all of them have memorable stories. Some better than others, but I can clearly remember all the plots in every FF game. FFXIII had that, but the gameplay was too slow (yes SLOW) and linear.
The PS1 FF games lacked enemies in the environment and realtime battles because of the lack in power of the consoles. With the coming of newer hardware, this changed. FF12 was an absolute masterpiece. All that needed changing was to make the license boards more unique to each character an...
that the battles aren't in a separate space like in the PS1 FF games. In FF12 the real time battles made everything seem more realistic. You could be fighting one wolf, then others will see there kin in danger and rush in and attack. It also made fighting less annoying because you don't have to go through loading screens and all that.
I could have tolerated the linearity and battle system if they adjusted the game to make the battles real time.
don't try to make it a fast paced action game. I had a Hitman game on the PS2 and the planning was awesome. I remember that the first level after you leave the church is to go to some mansion and try to rescue someone from the basement.
I remember having to either kill the milkman to gain entry or try to take out a peeing guard to disguise my way through. I hope they don't do what Zipper did with SOCOM 4 and keep the tacticalness that made the franchise.
I had the Move for a while. Its definitely 1:1 with Sports Champions. I think its up to developers to fine tune it to work better.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
extremely insulting to Bethesda. FAble was never a deep RPG. It sowed signs in the first, but never had anything close to the content TESIV had.
they said they were supporting campaign coop.
I don't see them having online coop because of the many things the game has (destructibility, large environments etc..)
NO SECOND CHANCE. If they remove the knife lunge, and actually not make the game lag (its P2P but I've played other P2P games that don't lag) the game actual has a chance of being good.