of course they are.
but the thing is, those women are usually strong arse kicking women.
if you ask me, the most problematic representation of women in gaming doesn't come from these half naked women in beat em ups and such, it's actually princess peach.
maybe yorda.
nobody could say either of those characters are overexualised, but they do only exist as prizes or burdens for the male hero.
they have no agency, they have...
if you think the value in the game comes from a few pixels that represent a nipple, that says a lot about you.
funny how you demand changes to games when they have gay or trans content, but alter a few pixels to make some nipples less prominent and it's devaluing the game?
honestly, this is one of the most pathetic things i've ever seen from your joke of a site.
can you show me anywhere that somebody demanded the removal of Camm...
could be worse, just imagine if this guy from ign started a campaign to get somebody fired for a tweet, i mean, how unprofessional would something like that be for a so called journalist.
that "journalist" would be a right arsehole wouldn't he?
http://thegg.net/opinion-ed...
and it's fun...
remember that game from the PS1 days called Apocalypse?
Bruce Willis looks just like the guy from that. ^_^
mra manchild comment.
if it's just a skin, what's the fucking problem
there were women fighting in WWI, that's a fact, so that's not unlrealistic.
you bleat about realism, then say it's ok to use anachronistic weapons.
it's not realism you care about, it's keeping women out of the game.
if you want accuracy, then you should have one life and if you die you can never play again.
and you know why there were so few women soldiers?
apart from russia, where the men didn't want to fight.
not because they were incapable, but because insecure men and their sexist attitudes that women can't be soldiers.
it's a shame idiots still hold that outdated belief a fucking century later
http://ww1centenary.oucs.ox...
i suggest you educate yourself before making a fool of yourself again.
for example, the russians had 15 women only battalions.
http://historybuff.com/wwi-...
no Cammy?
i am disappoint.
about a week after 49 people got murdered by by a bigot just for being gay, the gamer so called community has to whinge about a game having gay characters in it.
but why would they publicise it you bleat.
i don't know, maybe because, and i say again, we're about a week out from some bigot shooting up a gay nightclub murdering 49 innocent people, and they wanted to show some support for the LGBT community.
if i used the language the repugnant ...
link was supposed to be an avatar for the player, that's why they never had him speak.
well, gaming's not a boys club any more, if it ever was.
women and girls play games too, deny it all you want, and i know you will, but there are almost as many female players as male these days.
maybe even more when it comes to Nintendo platforms.
why can't there be a female option for them?
it's not the same person in every game, this Link isn&#...
it's free to play with microtransactions, mods could allow cheating, that's fine for Fallout 4, but not for a game like Shelter.
so i wouldn't hold my breath.
if my experience with the first game is any indication, some anti nausea medication would be helpful.
if i'm hoping to play for more than about ten minutes at a time.
shame you can't say the same about the fanbase.
it's kind of pathetic that THIS is one of the least offensive comments here.
well, the response to this was about what i expected.
and people say there's no homophobia in gaming.
i hope you're all proud of yourselves, you're the reason why everybody else sees gamers as basement dwelling mouth breathing bigoted scumbags.
not only do you shame the name "gamer" but you also shame humanity.
and yes, i know not everybody on here is like that.
but this site has become ...
you must not have been here very long.
taking over the world you say?
you mean just the parts of the world that have it, and most of the world doesn't because niantic cheaped out on the servers.