Harmy666

Member
CRank: 5Score: 18550

Much clearer, thanks.

4192d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm not quite sure I understand.

Do we pay a monthly/yearly sub to play the latest games, instead of paying $60 straight out? Or is it like a demo?

Paying the subscription to play a demo seems kinda wrong...

4192d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Japan or London are by far the best locations a game like Watch_Dogs should be set in...

4192d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Not possible as it doesn't have a ratio of 16:9... But I see the point you are making...

4202d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wut?

4202d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why all the dislikes? What he is saying is absolutely true...

4202d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You still need a PlayStation in order to use the PlayStation TV...

4202d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

That's actually a great idea, I'll do that in future!

4208d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"After spending $500 I shouldn't have to augment the system with an external device."

So you'd rather open up the console to have to replace the drive, instead of simply adding up to 16 TB of external storage...

EDIT: You need to stop defending internal vs external storage the way you doing. When it comes to the current generation of consoles (Xbox One/PlayStation 4) the Xbox One has the advantage of easily plugging in a external hard drive...

4208d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's amazing to see how many people are genuinely excited by this. Everyone saying the graphics are great, but they are not. They are good, compared to previous iterations of this stupid franchise.

4215d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"People will write it off just because it's CoD like always"

You couldn't be more wrong! People will buy it because it's CoD. And that's also the reason why development got lazy. They would ship out "new" shit, and people still bought it.

Graphically, it looks improved. Gameplay wise, it's just another run, shoot bad guys, run, explosions, shoot bad guys, more explosions, win.

LAME.

4215d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Jeez, the game hasn't even been released and you're already bitching...

4216d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

I'm not saying it's not going to look great, I'm very certain it will, but I can't remember the last time I played a game and was stunned by the graphics all the way through a game.

When a graphically stunning game, I notice it for the first 30 minutes. After that, it's the gameplay that matters. The only upside I can see buying TLOU for PlayStation 4 is the additional DLC that's included, and you get to play with a better controller. Apart from that, ...

4216d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Amazing what a year of hard work can do.

4216d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes. Article over.

4216d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ha.

4223d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

You're joking right? Steam's UI by itself puts it in last place. That thing is terrible to navigate. Value wise, Steam wins hands down.

4223d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

1. Titanfall - AMAZING game, still playing it to this day.

2. Watch_Dogs - Great game, solid mechanics, and the graphics aren't as back as people say

3. Metal Gear Solid: Ground Zero - Never played it, but from what I've heard, it was far too short. Graphically it looks brilliant, though.

4228d ago 6 agree7 disagreeView comment

What's not true? The fact that Xbox One is also getting this Only On Playstation DLC?

Or the fact that Xbox One, due to recent updates in SDK, is able to achieve 1080p 60FPS, and now Playstation fanboys don't have anything to use against Xbox?

4233d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Timed DLC...

The difference between Sony and Microsoft is that Sony try to hide it's timed ("Only" on PlayStation), whereas Microsoft say "First on Xbox".

4235d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment