All Channels
Popular
Xbox & Playstation Gamer
CRank: 5Score: 54540

How dare you put Far Cry 5 in there, Far cry games are always good!

3082d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's all up to the developer? Look at Frostbite Engine, Battlefield looks dark and gritty with a realistic color pallet, Plants vs Zombies garden Warfare looks cartoonish with less detailed textures and a very vivid color pallet.

3088d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hope so, definitely needs optimization! I have it on X and it hurts watching people play on PC with similar or lesser hardware run it much better and looking better -_- I get PC is Verson 1.0 and Xbox is Version 0.54.86 (or something like that lol) but hopefully we get a 1.0 patch soon!

3088d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Beautiful? No. A mess? Yes. Fun and Addicting? FOR SURE!

3089d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

Battlefield has Pro support but since the #'s are dwindling over the past year EA is not going to push for that. GTA V though is kind of a mystery? I have 265 hours in TW3, but have yet to start Blood and Wine, looks like I need to dive back for another 50+ hours!

3090d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Looks like fun to me! I have watched a few gameplay videos of it recently and it seems tough but the physics are amazing!

3090d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exactly! I feel the same about Mario Kart 64 and Diddy Kong Racing

3091d ago 4 agree8 disagreeView comment

I agree, I bought it on X1 last week and after about 20 games on Solo I finally got my Chicken Dinner! The game runs like crap (even for an X1) and the crashing (5 games out of 20 crashed) and networking issues such as lag and rubber-banding are really bad.

That said, It has been a LONG time since a game has given me this much anxiety lol, in a good way though. It's a rush to play and even better with a friend on Duo! Performance is crap but when it works, it's an ...

3091d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yep! 1080p-4k @ 60fps is HUGE especially considering the game only runs at 1920x1620p on Pro (Still looks a little sharper than 1080p horizontally) but for X to run this game @1080p+ with better graphics @ 60 was not expected!

3095d ago 10 agree16 disagreeView comment

It looks so much better than on my Day One edition, the 60fps mode makes this game so much more fun in combat!

3095d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What? we must have watched different videos, I know it's not locked but it floats around 55-60fps 99% of the time, drops to 40's in Novigrad as expected. Both options are great!

3096d ago 9 agree3 disagreeView comment

Well that is a shame for PC fans, glad to see Pro getting HDR and I can't wait to play this at 60fps on X! Blood and Wine is waiting for me to finish this amazing game!

3096d ago 8 agree8 disagreeView comment

60fps on X most of the time, unless you go into Novigrad which it drops to 40s. Much better than Pro's 30 plus you get higher res textures and slightly better draw distance and HDR.

Pro already got the enhanced update to run at 1920x2160 checkerboard 4k and slightly better AO. Not gonna see 60fps mode on Pro Im afraid

3096d ago 10 agree4 disagreeView comment

Smh... I don't need to educate myself, I never said Texture filtering had to due with the AMOUNT of RAM, but the bandwidth of the RAM which X's 326gb/sec is over 100+gb/sec more than Pro's GDDR5. Stop saying "V-RAM" that means nothing on console, there is no dedicated GPU with on board video memory as a buffer. ALL RAM IS SYSTEM/VIDEO MEMORY! There is a reason you have VRAM and System RAM requirements together, not one or the other. usually around 8-10gb total for ultra ...

3097d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Also, the Pro can only use 5.5gb of it's 8 for graphics last I checked. The 1gb of DDR3 is the same as X1's extra 8gb of flash memory it uses for background task and to speed up the OS which is why the UI is a little faster on X1 than my Pro as well as running 4 apps +1 game in suspended mode vs Pro's 1 app + 1 game. The X has just over 8gb all for gaming

3097d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

That is simply not true my man. I have the game on PC and the "minimum" memory requirement is 6gb... also the Pro version runs at 1920x2160 checkerboard 4k after the update that came out 2 months ago.

Shadow filtering, Textures and Texture filtering are ALL Memory task.

3097d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

Pro is getting an HDR patch, they already released the Pro enhanced patch 2 months ago. Native 4k, slightly better AO and steady 30fps. X will be native 4k, Better shadows, Textures and texture filtering (more RAM) and performance mode with targeted 60fps @ 1080p-4k dynamic.

3097d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

No, PS4 Pro, PS4 and X1 all have 8gb RAM, X has 12gb. Memory will be the biggest difference when comparing these two consoles. More RAM, more assets just like PC gaming. Pro GPU and CPU boost is only good for Res and framerate upgrades really, it does have slightly faster RAM which helps a little but still the same amount as PS4 allocated to games.

In reality, X1X should be able to run the same game as PS4 Pro with a higher native res, same framerate and more graphical ass...

3097d ago 7 agree7 disagreeView comment

No, Pro only got bump in resolution and a slight boost in AO... thats it. Does not have enough RAM for better shadows, textures, Texture filtering, etc. I was not expecting a 60fps mode though! That is awesome!

3097d ago 13 agree5 disagreeView comment

Stop saying "CPU", Battlefield, COD, Titanfall and Battlefront have no issue running at a solid 60fps @ 4k with PC high/ultra settings. The game is poorly optimized even on PC trying to get a solid 60 @ 4k with an i7 and 1080i is not easy! The console is capable as those aforementioned games have proved it to be.

3102d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment