GOODKylePS

Contributor
CRank: 13Score: 61760

In b4 some moron tries to use outdated trophy information as a false accusation.

2501d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I dOn'T lIkE tHe TeRm ShOvElWaRe

2502d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

SVER 4 LYFE. One of my favorite moments was when they made all the maps neutral and suddenly all the excuses about SVER being OP disappeared and I played on all three factions.

2503d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Add self-projecting to the list. I'd almost feel sorry for you if it wasn't for the fact that you bring about all the flak you recieve.

2503d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Geez this cosplay journalist again. Thinking he knows everything and spouts borderline conspiracy theories. I'm noticing a trend here.

2503d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Dude above me accuses others of not finishing games before reviewing and then blocks people when proof is provided. I've also seen him score a bunch of titles way higher than the norm. Nothing wrong with that of course but something to consider before casting aside other reviews and realize this guy attacks others for their scores.

2507d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Keep making excuses and lying. It's hilarious watching you dig your hole.

2508d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hey look who it is! Speaking of negative, remember when you accused a guy of not finishing Rage 2's story before putting out a review and then proof was provided and in response you blocked all related parties? Good times.

2508d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm flattered you're following me so, but please take off the tinfoil hat. None of those shots are from the first 30 mins and you don't seem to understand that trophy unlock times are not a means for telling exact story playtime especially in open world games like Rage 2. Case in point, you say it took 5 hours to beat? The rough draft of this review says it took 5 hours to beat. Till next time appreciative stalker.

2511d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Or just make up numbers for someone who's played the game and has different, individualized tastes than you where cons and pros are weighted differently. That works.

2519d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

"Hopped up adrenaline gameplay, cool and distinct combat, and amazing weapons. 8/10"

WTF? Do people not understand how balancing pros and cons on an individualized basis works? o_O

2519d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

"Addictive and adrenaline injected gameplay"
"Many cool and distinct combat possibilities"
"The weapons are the bomb"

gives it an 8

2520d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

4.5/10 for Just Cause 4 funnily enough XD

2532d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's what you're worried about being spoiled on?! The minute we meet Otto you know what he becomes. trust me there's something else much more spoilery.

2764d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

*Puts on tinfoil hat* I'm ready!

2772d ago 15 agree111 disagreeView comment

Just an awful vile excuse for a man

2821d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

as the article predicted funnily enough, you're sexist and ignorant

2871d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

So completely different games that are in no way comparable?

2911d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

so to sum up 1. attack a site because they give a score you disagree with 2. Refuse to read their reasoning but remain mad anyway 3. Doubly make sure to include obscenities in your disagreement. N4G in a nutshell I guess.

2912d ago 28 agree16 disagreeView comment

Did you read the review? There are reasons for that score for that ONE person.

2912d ago 18 agree15 disagreeView comment