I'm not very savvy with networks, but I find that disabling auto DHCP solves DNS issues. Is this a thing? But then you have to manually assign an IP to every device on your network. Not overly difficult, but requires more effort than "plug and play".
DNS issue is most likely a crappy router problem.
Fastset fix? Reset your Switch.
Step 1: Hold the "Power" button for about 8 seconds. Switch will turn off.
Step 2: Press the "Power" button. Switch will turn on.
Fix'd.
K.
This article is actually a rebuttal against an Ars Technica article that questions the size. The article here is justifying the size based on its marketing value and reaches your own conclusion
How does this get approved? It's an ad.
Probably because their back-end account systems are ancient.
lol.
Not "getting desperate". I'm not trying to convince you of anything. But you're completely missing the point.
1 - Nintendo doesn't release specs because they don't sell consoles based on specs.
2 - Developer abusing his "privilege" and releasing the specs will probably have consequences on the developer community.
Right - you ask the important questions based on the use of the car. The rest, the "wiper glue" or whatever, comes down to trust that the manufacturer knows what they're doing.
Of course the reality is that someone's job was to sit down and spend hours designing the wiper glue. It had to be important to someone, to be quality tested. Someone made sure it was fit for use and that it would do the intended job, even though it means nothing to you as someone w...
Point is, it doesn't matter. Nintendo isn't selling you a CPU and a GPU. It's selling you a machine to play games on.
Specs don't matter because all you're ever going to be able to do with it is play games. You're not going to be doing word processing, or making feature films. Can you? Sure. Technically yes. But that's not what Nintendo's intention is. If all third parties refuse to make any software for Switch, then all Switch has to do is p...
Ah but you didn't read all of it, did you?
Please understand. Nintendo is one of the companies that pay for E3 to exist.
It also says twice the amount of people are interested in Switch compared to the same survey that was asking about PlayStation VR prior to its release.
The article seems to express this is a good thing. But who knows what context it's in? Anyone know anything whatsoever about the source? Kind of looks like a Buzzfeed-type site.
It's not posted as "News"...
I love the "no games" argument because the reality is, most people only own 2 games for their PS4/X1 anyway.
Uh, by your logic Switch has already performed better than PS4 on launch day.
People don't read anymore.
1 - You don't know the specs. And I assume you don't run a multi-billion dollar game publishing firm, either.
2 - Define "good" battery life? Even if it had 4 weeks of battery people would still complain.
3 - Also subjective.
4 - Similar price to everything else on the market. Remember PS3 launch? Anyone call PS3 a failure?
5 - Nope.
How many games are you likely to buy on day one? If Nintendo released 100 games, you wouldn't buy 100. You probably wouldn't even buy 10. Most likely 3-4 at the max. So why pour all this effort into marketing 100 games AND the console launch AND the accessories, etc, when you can spread out that conversation over an entire year?
Starting article headlines with the word "this"?
Agreed. It has to stop.