This is the first console CoD I am going to skip since Cod2. This feels exactly like the Medal of Honor series where the first couple kicked ass then they got progressively more mediocre. This will definitely be a skip if for nothing else that I despise what Activision is doing to gaming.
Every month we hear a line like this from MS or Sony and so very rarely do these companies announce something that is actually worthy of the hype.
So far the Wii is the only one that has gotten it right. Natal looks like a turd and Move is a complete ripoff of the Wii. I think Move will be better performing than natal, however Sony has proven they have no clue what makes a good motion controller when they released the sixasses.
Let's face it, the Wii sold well because it was the first to market and they did it so it was responsive. It was new tech that a lot of people who aren't gamers thought was cool. The rest...
No chance I am buying this for any price, probably still not interested if it were given to me.
That list sucks, I wouldn't give two squirts for anything on it.
I don't see why anyone is going to buy this thing. Why should it appeal to me? I don't want to flail around in my house at this stupid thing more than the Wii already makes me.
I couldn't be less interested in this game. Skipped the first two so I'll skip them all.
Bungie doesn'r make very good games besides the Halo series and personally I think that is overrated.
It looks like telling the truth gets you down to one lousy bubble. Amiright?
Haters gotta hate.
He's gone a bit off his rocker but he has done that before too. MGS2 while beautiful was frickin nuts, same with MGS4. MGS 1 and 3 where classics. It's like he make a great game every other sequel.
Natal is going to suck balls and I honestly feel the Move isn't going to be so hot either. But if I were to pick which of these two is going to sell console I would say the move. At least Move is new tech but I think both are going to be nothing more than footnotes in gaming history.
If you look, Natal is nothing more than the MS camera that they released years ago that actually has some support. Hell, they even took out the internal cpu that was supposed out make Natal so great...
@lh_swe
He didn't say anything about the 360. He was referencing the PS3 and for some reason you just had to pull the 360 topic out of thin air. Users like you are why this site sucks.
This will go the way of sixasses. Once people see it suffers from the same lag this product will fade into obscurity, just like the sixasses.
I don't see why they should call it a Wii-Too. That's a slap in the face to the Wii if you've seen the footage of the lag this thing. It's more like an expensive knock off that doesn't even work as well as the thing it's copying. It will be just as terrible as sixasses was.
Screw these fanboys that defend this PS3 screw up yet blast Microsoft when they have problems.
Not one game there that stirs any interest in me whatsoever.
It should be expected that N4G, the preeminent PS3 fanboy site on the net, would have this article leading things off. Seriously, the news is great here, the users not so much.
am I paying $15 for this. Forget it. MS is slowly inching up the default pricing for new games. Wait for it, two years from now new arcade releases with same amount of gameplay as a Castle Crashers or even this will be $20. $15 is the new $10.
Absolutely agree with Nathan Drake2, if the PS3 were $399 or lower at launch they would have mopped the floor with MS. Especially with the problems MS has had with reliability. They have been fighting the negativity the initial price point has had since the moment it was announced.