GCU?
Yeah not as much under their belt, but I think potential to exceed Pixar is evident. With time we'll see. Also of the movies you mentioned, I only liked Nemo. If I suggested a Pixar movie, it would be "Up" movie if comparing to the feels that ND produced with TLOU.
No one cares about the story. If it mattered, the characters would be old by now story-wise.
Better than Pixar. They're the Scorsese of story telling, and do for gaming what David Chase did for television. They're stories aregreat, but characters especially are amazing. They "know" people.
Nope.
I did. Was a MAJOR fan of MGO. Played several tournaments too. What YOU fail to understand is that MGO3 is not developed by the same team as MGO1 or 2. It is a western team who already confirmed it will be different. Their even removing hold-ups in TSNE, No more CQC, no more knifing, no rolling, no back-step evasion move, oversized maps (the map in trailer also looked terribly unbalanced), no ability to cycle weapons or box-pop because they refuse to alter TPP's controls for multiplayer, ...
Evidence please. They have not given one ounce of information to suggest that this game will be any less casual than COD. And that scares me. They specifically mentioned removing some MGO staples for no damned reason...
About time.
Edit: Meh, Robert Peeler conyinued dodging questions. The game releases in couple of weeks and still bo info on Mgo. Scared it might be in development hell. Hope not.
3 years and still no MGO info. Just a lame trailer from a year ago. I think MGO is gonna be DOA.
Relax. Even if u can't get it now it will be availabke in a few hours since it's Tuesday. Not like this month's games are so great.
Any word on MGO?
Metal Gear Rising Reveangance 2. What Kojima originally showed is the kind of stuck Rocksteady could do a great job at continuing. Not that Platinum Games didn't do a good job, but in terms of exploration, lore, atmoaphere, etc, I think Rocksteady could do it justice.
Why not?
Unless you're Iwata or Reggie, E3 has plenty to offer.
The current Nintendo admins are clueless.
They did before Iwata. I like to think of those days as the REAL Nintendo. Not because of console power, but because they did EVERYTHING right. The Iwata administration is something that i'd like to think of as nothing more than a mistake. A casual, kiddy, clueless, excuse-making, 3rd party abandoned, hermit-like, non-hardcore mess.
Not necessarily. The Wii U cost is due to it's controller and other factors
As a Playstation fan and huge FromSoftware fan, Bloodborne really wasn't that great. In my opinion.
If Iwata and Reggie are still defensive and refuse to see how badly their E3 was done, as well as the bad management of Wii U, then why the hell should I expect things to change when the NX is released?
Nintendo (under Iwata) has been doing terribly enough; while Playstation has been around long enough, for me to say that (for me) PlayStation is the new Nintendo. When Iwata and Reggie go, then I'll care again about Nintendo.
Uncharted 3 had the WORST known to gaming. The maps were clearly made with co-op in mind, but no regard for team multiplayer. Too many dead ends and long corridors.
Not enough people. Nobody cared when SF4 was a prequal. Sf5 looks like it is a prequal again.