Fair enough, thank you very much for clarifying :) The game really does look good, and even better with your review.
You reviewed this in only a few hours?
This game is actually super pretty.
It's pretty short but hard.
Really exciting product. Someone on Reddit said rightly that this and the Oculus are good for one another. There are a lot of cool features the vrase has as mentioned in the interview that sets in apart, but the competition is good.
Supplant "waste of time" with "entertaining" and you have yourself a more moderate, accurate statement. I love GR for its humour, don't go shitting the bed over some fun, you scrub nub.
"So"? That's ridiculous. They were callous errors. Poorly edited and sloppily written. In a journalistic career, that shouldn't happen.Standards are important.
Couple of spelling and grammatical errors in this article.
@devwan
It's custom PC architecture. That is PC architecture, but modified. When on the Cell processor on PS3, there was a pretty big gap, that was due to massively different architecture. And yet, with the PS4, that gap still exists in similar form. Regardless of OS and bottlenecks from mem. distribution, the PS4 should be much easier to port to. So why is there no AA? Or as many dynamic effects? For a company as large as Ubisoft, you wouldn't expect the game's q...
Except that the article, as evinced by the question mark in the title, is conjectural. As for "flimsy evidence", the PS4 runs on PC architecture, and has been said to allow for very fast ports of games. We see how the PC version is running - significantly better than on the PS4. This /would not/ be if the graphical capabilities at launch are already below what AAA devs are striving for.
@ShugaCane
Satire is just one channel for humour, and while it does demand a degree of subjective questioning or questioning mockery, those questions still do not need to be grand or profound. That's like saying every joke has to be long. It mandates an unnecessary restriction. That's why quips are so loveable. Short, easy jokes, but sharp. I think that can exist in satirical form too.
Lovely.
@ ShugaCane, I can accept your opinion on that, though I disagree on it not having purpose. Humour doesn't always need a grand, reflecting backdrop. Teasing the little things works too.
When you start off by saying "I'm tired of satire", you're not going to enjoy a satirical article, and shouldn't be one to judge it.
Commentary is present in this article, and while it's meta, it's not that vague. But naturally, the self-referential layers seem to be going over your head.
It's a little disorienting to see that people cannot identify satire.
But funny to watch them believe it's a serious news piece.
You didn't read it, presumably. None of you seemed to have xD
That seems like an odd discredit to fictitious writing. "Made-up" stories, so to speak, can evoke just as much emotion and sympathy as non-fiction. The response is heavily reliant on the quality of writing. Writing can be as immersive as games can be.
It's a humour piece.
Sounds like porn for the corporate man.
I KNOW :D It took it's time though, wow >_>