So if its a success are you going to publish a retraction?
Its never worth getting a system for one game, including this one.
I get it, Halo has a legacy, there's so much fanboy blind love for it, but honestly this just looks like really boring and bland gameplay.
Then dont buy it, simple as that.
Well there's those of us who can see the obvious difference and those of us who are making excuses for xbox's short comings. And its a solid showing cause its better, little ironic on your part to put down 900p when xbox cant even do that, LOL.
Classic example as to why the term "game journalist" is thrown around way to much. Far to many people claim they are without having the knowledge or experience to be one. This is why game review scores are so broken, most come from people with little to no credibility in the industry as a whole.
If there was nothing to defend he wouldn't be defending, must be doing something wrong.
I was going to blow this off as another waste of web space comparison garbage and say something like, 'we still doing these', but wow I have to say the difference is very noticeable here and PS4 hands down looks much better, solid showing for the Playstation brand, that lower res on xbox is just muddy and bad. Cant believe at this point with all the the changes and secret sauce xbox still cant do better then 720p on this game, sad really.
Typical Microsoft arrogance to compare Halo to Star Wars on any level, which it doesn't even come close, Microsoft may wish Halo was on the same level as the Star Wars franchise but that's all it is, wishful thinking.
Old fanboy wars like Amiga vs. Atari are going to pale in comparison to current fanboy wars because back then you didn't have the social media and web sites we have today, back then if you wanted to crap on someones system of choice you had to say it to their face which meant you had to have the balls to do it, now days you can anonymously hide behind the safety of your keyboard and run your mouth so it should come as no surprise that "this gen takes the cake".
Console sales is an indicator of where people want to play games, so apparently you're wrong.
No the bigger shame is that hardly anything is made here, perhaps if we produced more of our own products we could buy more of our own products.
You couldn't be more wrong, the high price of PS3 was just one of many reason most jumped ship from the Playstation brand to Xbox 360, had it not been for that 360 might not have had the initial boost it got early on which helped to cement its lead far into last gen.
Dude needs to get out more. That area on the other side of your door is called outside, go check it out.
Nope, and this comparison is pointless and a waste of time anyway.
LOL, hilarious.
The problem with the "current fanboys" is the previous fanboys, see last gen Sony fans got to hear constantly how much better 360 was selling over PS3, they crammed it down PlayStation fans throat on a constant basis, they pointed to web sites like VGChartz for proof, the very same web site they now claim is unreliable, so you see its those very xbox fanboys that created this "winning" mentality and now they are just getting it thrown back in their faces, apparently they d...
Little more then PR speak, their losing so its "were focused on the gamer" but if they were winning it would be a very different message.
"Define A Generation" LOL I dont think so, not much more then another entry in a pretty stale franchise being handled by a developer that doesn't have the same talent the original dev did. I get it, its xbox's premiere game, the only one that matters apparently but the fanbase puts far to much faith in it and should temper their expectations. The game will probably be fine but define a generation? not even close.
They do its a special crucible mode called Mayhem, the supers dont recharge instantly but they recharge really fast.