That's not simple, just obvious thinking.. and we don't know that yet.
That's like saying the 6870 is more powerful than the 5870 just because it has a higher model number, and for anyone who's even a little into tech would know that's not true.
People already disliking the posts, must be pro sony fanboys in denial.
I mean the facts are there in the link i posted, XboxOne or even PS4 couldn't dream of running any of those games @ 4k res at even 30fps. Some games are already limited to 30fps on the next gen consoles that aren't even released yet!, and that's at 1080p.. that says it all.
Here's an idea, why not backup your dislike with an informative reply? oh that's right.. becaus...
Pretty sad that a card of this power cannot even bring 60+fps in all games, but then again that's at 4k resolution link here http://www.pcauthority.com....
of course, for 1080p and 1440p this card should be a complete beast, way better than anything in the new consoles.
Plus GDDR6 will be out next year, maybe worth holding out for ...
Considering Dreamcast came out like a year before PS2, DC was ahead of its time, it matched up to PS2 graphics easily & had better than arcade perfect ports like Soul Calibur and Crazy Taxi, it was only like 10% of titles that showed better graphics later on with the PS2.
Too bad developers gave up for the hype of PS2, i'm sure the DC could've given the PS2 a longer run for its money.
I see you've played knifey spoony before..
Who cares about Crytek, they can't even release games that run decently on good PC's @ launch.. Crysis 3 ran at what 30-40fps at best at launch? not even 60 for an average framerate.. when will developers learn.
How was it best? it just had a few extra things added and came out a while after the DC version..
it's obvious they hate the fact when we point out better things about PC games they hate it, but if there's slight differences like a 360 game looking a bit better than a ps3 game, or vice versa then they boast about the better version.
I'm more interested in the PC version for 64 player online at least.
As the GTX 780 shows us, the PS4 pretty much has overkill amount of GDDR5.. but everyone has to remember its sharing the graphics memory with the whole system, rather than having dedicated DDR3 for the rest of the system.
3gb is more than enough for a gfx card of next gen, Titan went overkill just because it's overpriced, 6gb of ram in that twice as much as the 780 and barely any faster.
Most ppl have like 4-6gb of DDR3 ram in their system, so a next gen ...
Well any good medium/high end graphics card from 2009 could run the game quite decently, so if this one is at least optimized a little bit then it could run even better than IV did.
its definitely overrated, at the time i first played Halo i'd gotten an Xbox in like 2002 i think, it was no match for the fun of Soldier of Fortune 2 online multiplayer on PC, that was just great fun. I found Halo rather boring and didn't see what the hype was about, Half Life 2 in 2004 was way better on PC.
Heh, does not matter to me if people game more on console or not, i prefer PC simply for bang for buck hardware, enjoyment of putting the hardware all together in the case and then enjoying the cheap games and great performance it brings..
They are just an all round good entertainment system and will always be able to do much more than a closed system like a console.
Console gamers can argue it's expensive (not as expensive as most make out), or that we h...
Well the difference is, for less than $1k you can build a PC with better in game options @ 1080p over console.. while usually keeping 60+fps. Something consoles don't stay good at. It's not all about resolution, plus games are always cheaper on PC.
It's only about double the cost of a console @ launch, and you pay thru the nose for launch games on consoles anyway.
Seeings as all the things you can do on a good PC like edit video, run emulators, f...
Interesting benchmarks, shows Intels CPU's are still pretty strong in comparison to AMD's. A Quad core Intel CPU recommended and for AMD the 6 core.
That's some bad input lag, i always watch out for input lag when i buy PC monitors, Dell ones tend to be rather high like 60+ms, my current Samsung i think is like 12ms or below.
The input lag here whatever is causing it looks like it's far higher than 100ms..
Actually, i think i've played online games with 140-150 ping on some servers over in the US and the response time isn't even as bad as that.
This game will be worthy of a new graphics card at least, for sure. Source 2 can't come soon enough.
These things are tiny, anyone with even half decent computer knowledge would know that you could build a much better gaming computer in a mini ATX case for cheaper, sure it won't be as small as these things but it will be pretty portable if you want to move it into your TV room every so often.
Have to agree with you, they care more about a game looking best rather than great with performance. They rather release a average/below average game with great graphics rather than a good game that runs well.
Their games always run as badly as benchmarks do even on good computers, that is not really acceptable.
I've never cared for their games anyway, i much prefer Valve's stuff.
4k is hardly worth it, you get the same picture quality across 2/3 monitors.. unless you mean buying a very expensive 4k single monitor.
That resolution has huge problems, 1 is you always have to keep to that native resolution or the quality will be noticeably worse if you drop it lower, 2 frame rates will suck unless you have 2-3 graphics cards, 3 micro stuttering (now actually being fixed slowly by AMD)
So yea, i really don't think its worth the perform...
It's funny that my post got blocked for trolling when i am simply stating facts, this site's comments section is like a school playground. People babble any crap they want and it gets thought of as truth.
This place gets more and more pathetic every day.
I wish people would get clued up before posting rubbish, but then i have to remember its mainly kids posting here.
if people say "PS4 is awzum, beter than any PC ever!" peop...