yup, higher resolution than the PS2 could even display. and it's DOA1 had better resolution and framerate than the PS1 ver.
right decision? you missed out on a TON of games that the mediocre ass PS2 never got, you know that right? cant call yourself a gamer without having ever experienced Powerstone #facts
playing it with a mouse easily feels 1000x better than a PS3 controller. your movements have more momentum and inertia. it makes it feel like a different game almost entirely from that alone and i HAAAAATE using a keyboard for jumping and shit but for playing with a mouse its worth it
imagine if it was source 2 and exclusive to Valve VR, or "valVR". of course gamers can get a 2d image from that if they mod it.
@GreenRanger pff try 2. most companies are bringing out auto-stereoscopic displays by 2017 if not sooner. in 25 years there probably wont be any 2D displays left as holographic lightfield displays (which the military will be using AS STANDARD by 2016 http://www.businesswire.com... will be ubiquitous and can show full 3D to eve...
weve had glasses free 3D since 2004. trouble is people dont want to focus on 1 glasses free 3D screen technology and that stops progress because you have every company making their own proprietary glasses free 3D tech instead of refining an idea that works (new screens out now have a full 160 degree viewing angle before the image breaks up).
Auto-stereoscopic displays that are coming out soon will play an even bigger part in gaming than 4K displays. if they dont i will have lost all faith in game companies.
lord i hope not. for gaming's sake..
@slasaru01 I couldnt imagine BT in a modern setting but imagine a ninja turtles game for next gen that had the look of the 1989 movie and the weight of the costumes and was done in the style of the Rockstar's The Warriors?
Gears better look better than this and it better be a showcase UE4 title to show off the xbox one's "rocket powered" architecture or whatever.
does seem too much like halo 4. i thought the graphics would be a little close to the level of the halo 4 cg trailer. UC4 looks like that much of a leap on PS4.
idk man. id rather game in glasses free 3D at 1080p rez per eye. i would be happy if the next nintendo console could handle that with some kickass graphics and presentation that isnt super kiddy. it wouldnt need 4K for me. once graphics evolve a huge leap and look truly photoreal then 4K and 8K monitors are gonna be more worthwhile investments but by then i think holography and lightfield based 3D displays will dominate the gaming world. your children will most likely argue about hogels, not ...
you let your wife game on a telephone? youre not a gamester. --->
No Sovkhan, Too bad for us, Too bad for us..
still use mine more than I use my 360. and playing on a 50" 1080p plasma in VGA mode it looks just as good as xboxlive arcade remakes with better responsiveness in the controls. Powerstone in VGA mode > any HD fighting game.
you obviously have never played a Dreamcast in VGA mode..
people still citing the wonderful 101 as a reason to get a WiiU? smh..
Is it really wrong? compare how nintendo presented its games in its golden age versus how they do now. supermario 64: creepy ominous music in the bowser levels, enemies that actually spooked you a bit when you confronted them. super mario 3D world: catsuits, no real sense of danger (the princess isnt in trouble this time), and bright colorful friendly plush-toy looking enemies. which design process is more kiddy sounding to you?? nintendo of the mid 90's or the nintendo of now?
Nintendo, bring back metal mario with insane graphics in glasses free 3D 1080P. das it mayne.
HOTD with the saturn 3D controller controls so nicely. still has smoother reticle targeting than any game out even today imo. just bought a modded saturn a while back and have been having wayyy more fun on it than my friends PS1 (i myself only had N64 back in the day)