More than likely, this will be the best-selling of the series.
Props to Bungie, seriously.
I've had mine pre-ordered since the beginning of July.
9/14/10
the article was very well written. Halo: Reach, for myself, and for a lot of others, will be the most-played shooter in our collective video game libraries, for some time after its released.
9/14 couldn't come soon enough.
So, what you're saying is no other video game/software company has ever made any type of merchandise, for consumers to purchase, because they are a fan of a particular game/movie?
Riiiggghhhtttt, Keep dreaming.
Ivory Tower remake looks great, nice third level in the midship remake, and Spire looks awesome.
The wait is getting ridiculous.
'I would have something to PLAY besides a Halo that should be DLC.'
.......really?
.......LOL @ your 2 bubbles.
*smh* Enough with the 'milking' comments, Halo isn't the first/last game to have several sequels made after the original.
Standard def? Seriously? Riggghhhtttt, whatever you say man, whatever you say.
*sigh*
Reach's graphics far surpass ODST's, I don't know what photos everyone else is looking at.
It's a shame you only have one bubble, seems like I won't get a 'mature' reply back.
Like I said before, the sheer amount of content in Bungie's last game, will be a sight to see, remember that before you make ignorant comments.
And I'm Santa Clause lol
Some gamers don't have gf's, is how it should read.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Bungie did not make Halo wars, thus your point is somewhat flawed.
I will agree that the time between Halo games have been closer together, but 6 months apart is pushing the boundaries of the point you are trying to make.
Especially considering the fact that the only Halo games that come into close contact with each other, (ODST and Halo Wars) were not both made by Bungie, which is what I was saying in my original post directe...
Can't. Wait.
'6 months later they poop one out.'
ODST 09/09... Halo:Reach 09/10...your point equals FAIL.
'polyphony digital cares about the quality of their game'
Im sure they do care, but don't assume that Bungie doesn't. While MS may be about money, so is Sony, Nintendo etc etc. Don't talk sh!t on Bungie, seriously, just don't.
Not sure why I'm commenting but...
KZ3 Graphics > Halo: Reach Graphics
Halo: Reach Gameplay > KZ3 Gameplay
Halo: Reach Content > KZ3 Content
The sheer amount of content Bungie's last Halo game will have, will be a sight to see, seriously. Never been disappointed by Bungie, minus Halo 2's ending, so I don't see how they could f@ck this one up either. Actually? I know they won't.
My opinion of course...
It's one thing not to like Halo, but to say it wont sell? You are delirious, to say the least.
Halo: Reach will sell by the boat-loads, guaranteed.
If you believe otherwise, you must be sleeping under a rock, or just an idiot. Plain and simple.
Graphics vs. Content
That's what it comes down to.
These graphics rock it hard, plus the amount of content you get, versus what other games give you, is virtually astounding.
Reach = Amazing.
Lovin' this sh!t :D
I've got an EVO and this will compliment it very well, :D
There were some issues but it was highly enjoyable most of the time.
BG looks really, really nice, so stoked! :D
I was just about to repeat what you just said.
You are correct sir.
However, I don't see anything topping Android, anytime soon, even the iPhone and Apple have lost the majority marketshare. (27% vs. 23% respectively)
The MS phone would need at least a dual core processor (1.5 ghz), at least a decent 5 MP camera, a responsive touch screen, 8 gb internal memory with a micro SD upgradeable to 32 gb, hdmi out, a price point of no more than 199.99 after rebate, etc.
If that were to happen, MS would be up there with the rest. ...