Well, a lot of people didn't believe them. They had to defend themselves http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
But it's fun to watch other people's misfortunes.
I thought I saw this story before on http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
Are all the CAPS necessary?
True. EA was less than stellar their first time out. I guess Terminal's Issue is that they praised the PS3 for so long and are now throwing them under the bus. I'd blame Sony for not making sure this game didn't look perfect on the PS3, but I'd put more blame on Terminal for not coming clean about having issues with the PS3 earlier. This just blew up in their faces. I wonder if they even thought they could have gotten away with this scam.
How did a spelling mistake get approved? How many people are that illiterate?
I've never seen a video comparison force the dev team to explain their actions before. Maybe Sony should start fully supporting the companies willing to port to their machine.
It's about time Terminal Reality says something. Too bad it looks like back peddling. I'd like to see what Sony has to say about how they couldn't make Ghostbusters look the same across the platforms. And you can't say it can't be done. Ask EA and Fight night. They can show you how to make a game look the same.
If you honestly believe it's running at NATIVE 1080P, you deserve the PS3 version. It's being scaled up, noob.
Maybe Forest needs to take his glasses off and maybe get a better monitor.
You think they're gonna miss you? I doubt it.
I don't think the mods care considering the last news was based on a forum pst taken out of context. Explain how that's news? There's just no credibility to N4G anymore.
Well, I guess your wrong on all accounts. This post got approved, and people care enough to see the differences. It's too bad you're the only one not believing. I think you win the PS3 version. You can play it by yourself.
It's not like there's a whole lot of credibility to NG4. The top row has a playboy article, and a news article based on another post and the mods do nothing around here.
Check the pics. There's the proof.
It's funny how this can't get approved because it's based on a forum when the other article was approved. Oh, and the other post didn't even have pics to back up it's claim.
I haven't posted anything in a while. You can check my history.
Considering the other post based off a forum comment made top page, I'd hazard to say people seem interested. And you spent the time to write in here, so guess what? Looks like you care too.
Lens of Truth compared retail copies, along with arstechnica, gamezine, and Beyond 3d.
I like how this is an article about how the other articles keep talking about this issue. Isn't that like calling the kettle black? And there's no mention of the original source...
http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
At least be thorough.