why the f*ck would the console with the smallest fanbase this generation have exclusive games? so retarded.
the real answer is sex
its simple: using drm to stop a single player game from being pirated is virtually impossible, so why bother? multi-player, on the other hand, is easy to protect. valve looked at their options and made the best decision.
oh so awesome
damn that sucks, RIP
its not 150 bucks if you have to buy 2 or 3 of them when they keep rrod-ing.
its copyright infringement, the dude didn't steal anything. as such he shouldn't deserve the same amount of jail time as a freakn murderer. sheesh!
god how i loved rare back in the N64 days... so many good games and now? such a shame.
good, the endings suck anyway. (and there are only 4, of which very little is different between them).
PC is superior in every possible way, durrrr. Cry some more about couches and expensive equipment, all lies.
no game deserves a PERFECT SCORE, that is retarded. why? because every game can improved. probably even easily.
lol, WoW has nothing on Oblivion graphic-wise.
rofl @ bison thing killing itself.
you mean another reason to own a PC? console rts lololol
not everyone wants to wait an extra two years to play the protoss campaign. why couldn't they just cut the number of missions in each campaign by 30%, so we'd get 10 missions for each? THEN they could release the second and third parts for all campaigns in coming years.
episodic games be damned.
so lame.
is this at all related to the live action films with milla jovivich?
the ps3 is hard to develop for and has the smallest established fan base, and with squeenix's new[er] focus on amazing graphics (read: huge investment on individual games) of course they're hesitant to deal with the ps3. If anyone has hurt squeenix, it would be sony.
Why would SE want to exclusively support the least popular system this generation? Especially if it is such a pain in the ass to develop for...
Honestly.