I don't know why this part annoys people so much. You pay to get the access to the games, which otherwise would cost more to play those games than the subscription costs. Whether or not it is worth it is something everyone has to decide for themselves, but the anger over not being able to play games that the only reason that you had access to in the first place is because of the subscription is whiny bitch territory. You get to keep everything you actually buy, so why do people get so ups...
I don't think you got the point there. I'm not saying that all girls are interesting. And yes there are vapid attractive girls, but that's why you don't go for someone just based upon their looks.
@ Hallucinate: My kids laugh at your stupidity.
I know that's not what you were going for, but you just proved that Live is more valuable. By taking both away, Live shows that is more valuable because you get a valuable feature by paying for it. PS+ is inherently less valuable because you lose nothing by not paying for it. PS+ is a luxury while Live is a necessity, in gaming terms. Necessities are always more valuable.
It's not an opinion, it's a flawed comparison. How is comparing a service that is required to get anything out of the console to a service that is optional an apt comparison? Without Live, Gold or Silver, the 360 is a barren wasteland. Seriously, without an internet connection, the 360 is empty as far as the interface is concerned. You cannot reasonably compare a service that is completely integrated into a machine to a service that adds extras at the subscriber's discretion. You ...
First of all, There is no such thing as PSN+. It is PlayStation Plus or PS+. This may be nit picky but knowing what shit is called is important because incorrectly identifying something creates incorrect assumptions.
Comparing Live to PS+ is retarded. Why? They are two completely different things. Live is the unified system by which the 360 interface exists. Live is completely integrated into the 360 and the interface is empty without an internet connection. To really get any...
That has got to be the stupidest fucking thing I've ever seen written. Yeah, you're right. To hell with the cute girls, go with the ugly chicks. They're grateful so you don't have to put up with their bullshit.
There are no spoilers if you've read all the books.
You're absolutely correct. People are stupid if they buy PSN+. You can't say it any better than that.
Of course, people who buy PlayStation+ (abbreviated as PS+) are still up for debate. Of course, they do get a point in their favor for knowing what it's called.
EDIT: My hopes are low, but I gotta be me. And I thought it was funny. Looks like you did too. So bubbles for being intelligent enough to read the whole thing.
Why does somebody not liking Crackdown 2 mean they are a Sony fanboy? I have both a 360 and a PS3 and I prefer my PS3, mainly because I've had it longer. I played the demo for crackdown 2 and I thought it was so-so at best. The controls were fiddly and the presentation was just a pain in the ass. It was difficult to figure out what was going on and where to go. From what I remember of the first crackdown, it was always easy to figure out where you needed to go to start your missions, race...
Because he seems to one of those people that thinks if you repeat something enough, people will believe it.
How does ignoring reviews make you a true gamer? I can respect giving the game a chance despite mixed reviews, but to claim that it makes you a "true gamer" is just ridiculous. All it does is make you contrary and an ill-informed consumer. If you think you will enjoy it, by all means, spend your money as you see fit. But don't act like you're better than other people who do look at reviews and decide against certain games. All that does is make you look like an asshole.
Granted, eating healthier will make staying at a healthy weight easier, it also has a lot to do with a lack of physical activity. You can eat somewhat healthily, but if you sit on your ass all day, you're going to pick up some extra baggage.
And there is a simple way to lose weigh: Eat less, move around more. All it costs is discipline and effort.
But that's not getting ignoring the whole western world's obsession with being underweight.
...
There was a lot of meat on those thighs.
It wasn't that the enemies were smarter or more of them, well there may have been more of them, but the only real difference is the fucking grenades that were thrown 10 at a time, only at you, non-stop from beginning to end.
Nintendo may have saved the industry after the crash in the 80s, but video games were considered kids toys and the only adults who played them were socially inept losers (I don't mean to imply that they were losers, but rather that's how they were perceived). When Sony released the original PlayStation, it brought a new era to gaming and it can be directly linked to the level of acceptance that gaming has reached today.
For example: We wouldn't have the 360, witho...
The way I understood it was that Bungie bought themselves out from Microsoft and Microsoft accepted because Bungie agreed to give them first crack at anything they develop. But now they are working with EA Partners.
Also, the only reason why anyone thinks this is possible is because Insomniac made a deal with EA partners too. But Insomniac did it to own their IPs for once.
I never said Live wasn't worth paying for considering everything you get. I just don't understand why no 360 fans can figure it out that when people say that paying for online isn't worth it, they're not saying the other shit you get with it isn't worth it. How does making online play free hurt the service? Could it be that all those features suddenly might not be worth it to a lot of people?
I have Live, so I know it's worth it, but I don't think ...
Take $50, divide by 12. There you go.
EDIT: No shit you can't find it for $4 a month. The idea is you get a discount for buying for a year. It's like going to Costco, it costs a bit more, but the overall price per unit is less comparatively.
360 fans say it shouldn't and PS3 fans say it should, but it just doesn't make sense to me that 360 fans actually argue that online play should be paid for. Why? No other console, handheld, or PC/Mac requires you to pay for online play. You can argue that all the other features like cross game chat, party system, cross game invites, etc is worth paying for, but not online play. But Microsoft won't let online go free because they would lose a lot of money and they've got people...
That must be why the 360 version is releasing day and date with the PC version, huh?