i don't think any included DLC as they were all from PS2/3/DS/PSP era. But they got remastered twice. Then another coming later with Dream Drop distance being bundled in. I guess by that logic, they're capable and expected of doing so. But none of those were subscription models..
For the weekend?
I'm getting PS5 regardless, lol. Day One though, well I'll check my wallet then.
it has to happen, or at least a spiritual successor, I loved the Lovecraftianess of it, even though I didn't know I was a Lovecraft fan. Definitely my favorite Souls game, and one of the my favorite this gen.
$30 more. And still weaker than base PS4, BFV would look better on the PS4. 1TB PS4 Slim Spider-Man Bundle at $199 is the better deal. You can probably get BFV at $30 after you're done with Spider-Man and some backlog.
3DS did nearly as well as PSP, where PSP was considered successful in a time without smartphones. Wii was successful because of the gimmick, same as DS. People barely moving on from DS and 3DS was not much new besides 3D, and 3D was a dying gimmick. But it still was very successful, due to its wide support. Vita did not fail because of smartphones, 3DS did just fine, it failed due to lack of support. How is this hard to understand? Why blaming it on smartphones. Sony is to blame. Vita could ...
I didn't say NO role, just not as major a role to thwart its success or kill handhelds. Vita was a complete failure in excecution, and you can't blame smartphones for it, because it couldn't hold a candle to the 3DS. It was hardware(gimmicks, memory cards, or otherwise) and lack of support(developers, apps, etc). if it even did half as well as the 3DS, we'd see a successor.
Sorry, the smartphone market wasn't what killed it, not really even competition if Vita had more major exclusives. 3DS did fine, in fact it did very well, and you know why? Support, exclusives. Hate when people mention smartphone market as a excuse for Vita's failure.
How does wanting it increase your income?
Already thinking i'll try it when i can get it for $10, for the trophies. Apart from graphics, looks quite generic.
Exactly, over priced. All those are sub $10 on sale. So with PS Now and PS+ users, it leaves much less people that this would appeal too. You get all the games for $15, but how many of them are you going to play, how many of them are actually worth playing. People complain that PS+ is not worth the $3.50 a month because they won't play any of the games.
it's tetris, dude. Why the rush, wait for a sale, it's not going to change the way you view tetris forever, unless you're a huge tetris fan..
it's only a steal if you will play most of those games.. i have seen most of these games cheaply on sale or on previous humble bundles. Again, with PS+ and PS Now, flash sales, and previous Humble Bundles(last one containing most of these games + better/more), it leaves a smaller audience that this would be a "Steal" for $15. Define steal.
Titan Quest is not worth $15, lol, 2006 game. By digital pricing, maybe, Digital is usually over priced when not on sale....
Then only flawless/perfect game should be a 10/10? 10/10 should be given to the best execution of the criteria, of the genre, at that time. Graphics, sound, and even story telling are going to drastically change by generation and year. There is no flawless game, a game can be 10/10 and have flaws, just depends on how good it is in other areas to overlook them.
Got most with PS +, PS Now, and previous humble bundle, or on flash sales.. some are only for the budget gamers(mediocre or just ok ratings).. so no, i wouldn't say it's a steal. quantity is not quality, you can't just tack on a game you're likely just playing because you bought it, and add it as part of the take.
Lol. yeah if you calculate their full launch prices and not their current(permanent price-cut) non-sale prices.
Hugh savings!
$0.01 below!
*current base console dedicated SoC's* . they'll never catch up, it's a size thing. Consoles will be bigger, and have more room for power.
People like delays though, it makes the game more polished.