well, it IS a very good game. on the same level as mgs4, uncharted 2, etc. it will be a classic.
you know threads like this are actually very informative- they let you know who has an iq of 4 and who actually has an oppinion worth hearing.
dchalfont you my friend are a moron, its one thing to have an oppinion about what game is better but to try to say (rather hatefully i might add) that the game that won countless awards for best graphics looks like crap is just willful ignorance.. just like what bath said your oppinion isnt worth a damn.
i own both games, and ...
@SilentNegotiator
90 bucks for 250gb? lol i payed 100 for 500gb wd scorpio blue WD5000BEVT, and it has much better r/w times (try almost 3x as fast) than the stock drives even though its only 5400 rpm! it was @ best buy.
it compares well to most 7200rpm drives, because it has only 2 platters which increases data density on the disks, most 500gb drives are 3 or more platters.
edit: here it is @ newegg and cheaper too!
UGH! what?
windows 7 is actually very good, ive had no problems with it and ive had win 7 ultimate installed since september.
it almost belongs in the twilight zone it works well, its efficient, easy to use, and versatile.... and its windows!? it doesnt compute.
hell he looks silly NOW. Mass effect is a good looking game, but really its only strength is in the MAIN characters faces, the environments, lighting, and animations have all been done before,and done better (although not often) not to beat a dead horse but just look at uncharted 2 or killzone 2.
agreed...
ill complain because bruce on games is a moron, and every single one of his articles that ive read are poorly researched, state speculation and rumors as facts. he also has this magnificent ability to ignore microsofts failings and magnify sonys or nintendos failings.
so if you want to defend an article of this calibre go ahead you only make yourself look dumb.
haha, in case you didnt know mass effect is now a 3rd party game.. microsoft had no hand in it. it was EA... so as far as im concerned ms is still leaving the 360 in a drought..
not that mass effect 2 wasnt phenomenal, it was definitely a very very good game. its of my favorite games now.
come on people, GOW = God of War, whereas GeOW = Gears of War. kratos came first...
my bad it was the elite that launched @ 479. still not quite 500 though.
"@Lifendz
actually that doesnt work. i was hoping that if i installed both mass effect 2 disks i wouldnt have to swap them (i even made a thread in the forums on it) but unfortunately it doesnt matter if the content is on the hard disk you still need the disk in the drive. it felt pretty redundant to me."
PLEASE OH PLEASE! can one of you who disagreed with my comment above inform me how i am wrong. im pretty sure i just beat the freakin game- just check my ...
i think you guys are failing to realize that the xbox 360 launched at 500 dollars.. thats not too much less than 600.
@Lifendz
actually that doesnt work. i was hoping that if i installed both mass effect 2 disks i wouldnt have to swap them (i even made a thread in the forums on it) but unfortunately it doesnt matter if the content is on the hard disk you still need the disk in the drive. it felt pretty redundant to me.
@Cold 2000
in all honesty both installs AND disk swapping should have no place on consoles... i dont like either, but unfortunately i have no choice ie: mass effect 2, and mgs4.. just shut up and stop pretending that one is worse than the other.
btw 20 min installs are the exception not the rule, just like 4 disk games....
Edit: same goes to you low carb, and grewulf... honestly guys.
hmm i lost samara and jack, also it took me around 60 hours.