drewsny

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 4020

We have not seen any or have seen any of the games in the whole last guardian series because it is a new ip so i will not pass judgment. Uncharted 2 can be compared to mass effect 2. GOW 3 can be compared to any of the two halos in terms of hype and how much they will sell. Forza 3 can compare to GT5 if not pass it completely. Now when will any of you guys just admit that both consoles have their big games.

6116d ago 3 agree9 disagreeView comment

If left 4 dead sucks so bad then why did a sub par game that apparently sucks sell almost twice as much as one of sony's flagship games, killzone 2. I guess that proves that gameplay is greater than graphics.

6116d ago 6 agree9 disagreeView comment

you fanboys need to just stop being pathetic and just deal with the fact that there are multiple different console and people have different opinions. You can have your own opinion but please keep it to yourself and DO NOT make a separate fanboy news story that will just clog up an already clogged up site.

6116d ago 5 agree34 disagreeView comment

it had amazing graphics, oh wait. I forgot that this site is ran by ps3 fanboys who will say anything even if it is un true just to justify their purchase. It is quite sad actually.

6116d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

like really, they have not updated their details, for all we know they could have told us the minimum and it was originally going to be 5 hours long. Maybe it has evolved into it's own game with its own 15+ hour campaign.

6117d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

my perfectly fine but i do admit slightly fanboyish comment was deleted by the mod. I also find it funny how a blatent ps3 fanboy can get away with any comment but when i make a comment stating my opinion (which also stated i though it was good to get away from third party exclusives) and it was senselessly deleted by a moderator who was probably mad because the flagship games of the ps3 are now going to be on xbox.

6117d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment
6117d ago

the only good thing about the iphone compared to the omnia HD is that the iphone has an app store but that really can't be an argument. whats the point of getting the iphone if you're only going to use the ap store because if you are then just get an ipod touch. It would probably cost you a couple hundred less in the long run. I just prefer my smartphone to be for me and if i wanted a kidie smart phone then i would get the iphone.

6118d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment

gears 2 already has like 4 map packs.
soon to be killzone 2 because they have already had 2 map packs and its only been 4 months.
fallout 3 has a lot of DLC but good DLC.

6119d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

my i910 already beats the iphone so why wont its next upgraded version beat it.

6119d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

this is a really bad idea. i know that there are many people in my scenario. i had to get a wifi signal because i would have had to get a 200 foot ethernet cord. You know how much a 6 foot HDMI cord costs, A LOT. I wonder how much a 200 foot HDMI 1.4 cord will cost.

6119d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

i just want more information. It would be badass if the game is a futuristic RPG.

6121d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

i would really just want one device that maybe a wristwatch that is an all in one device that is based on holographic technology that you can actually physically touch.

6123d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

if it can play community and arcade games then i will be jizzing in my pants. i definitely want to have a portable version of braid and castle crashers and dishwasher dead samari and all the other great games in the arcade.

6123d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

so where did you get these dollar estimates? obviously you had a bad case of diarrhea and crapped it out.

6123d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

it really doesn't take that much time for a multiplayer. Even if it is a local only multiplayer at first and then there is a patch to enable network. It still wouldn't have taken a long time. I mean really, aside from the maps, it only took bungie a couple of weeks to add in multiplayer for halo 1 and at the time, it was probably the best multiplayer experience out there.

6124d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

it would have been nice but i still don't really care. I guess they could have done a make as much mess possible type multiplayer that has like 4 people in one game but that might have sucked. I still think this game really didn't need multiplayer though. Games like this, bioshock, and any other genre plus rpg mix game if you know what im talking about. This game will still kick ass and thats why people will buy it.

6124d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

it is not the GPU and RAM that kept it from doing that, its the lack of an actual CPU. Basically what the ps3 has is a graphics card that has the ability of a processor. basically it is an all in one type thing, there is no need to have a good amount of ram, a good GPU, or a good CPU, when all you need is a cell processor that is only good for single floating point operations. That is why it is so hard to develop for the ps3. The xbox 360 is said to be easier to develop on because it has an a...

6126d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

wow this is a bad excuse for square not having any games to show.

6126d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

well they succeeded at making it look expensive but in reality, the components are good, but now that good. They should have went with 6gb of ram, 1tb HDD, GTX 295, and an i7 965 CPU.

6126d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment