Iwata is not the best choice. Seriously this guy needs to go. Oh and the nonsense about him being a good prez just because he won't sell-out by putting Nintendo franchises on cellphones is nonsense.
No sensible Nintendo fan would want that. Just because he knows that much, doesn't prove he's the best. I wish Nintendo could regain it's spirit for true domination again. I'm tired of Iwata's complacency.
Finally, I think that giving the ...
At Lawson:
Hey genius I originally said the 4 hour thing is best ONLY for 4 hours if we're only clocked while playing. I said in my original post that the other options (1 week, 90 days etc) would not be feasible unless they DID dock the hours when we are not playing.
Sorry but still not convinced. Why not just make it 4 hours in actual gameplay. Don't dock the hours that we spend when NOT playing.
Playstatiin NOW should charge the hours spent on a gam3 (the here and NOW). It's called PS Now not PS Not. If they want that much for 4 hours I think this could be best way. The other prices are decent as is (even if time is lost when not playing). But either way it's better to own. PS Now as a service is too expensive for Sony to ru...
I qlso think that dumping the gamepad is dumb. But if Nintendo could let gamers use their 3ds's as controllers for Wii U, then it could drastically increase sales since the 3ds userbase is substantially larger. I actually thought the 2ds would do that, since it's shaped like the Wii U game tablet--but the 2ds doesn't have a second analog stick. If it did, and also had a way to communicate with Wii U consistently, then it would sell both systems like hotcakes. Especially since cost...
Actually they DO need customer feedback. These "suits" have been rich a long time and don't feel the squeeze of economic inflation like we do. So they think we are made of money. They have no clue what it's like to still be poor/middle class. We have to tell them. And if they don't listen, we vote with our dollars. THEN the suits will have their own economic crisis to deal with.
I can't stream the ps now games that i already owned on ps3 for free. Are you 100% sure? Is it because i'm now on ps4's public beta and it can't recognize my ps3 digital library?
Actually it wouldnt be required.
Imagine paying a subscription for unlimited access to any virtual console game u wanted? That sounds good to me. It's not like they are asking for money to play games online.
Still though, a second party answers to 1st party when it comes to 1st party OWNED franchises. Still glad to hear that there will still be some online. Not having online 8n this would have been the stupidest decision made since the exclusion of online in Mario 3d world.
Smt 4. Hell, anything by atlus. Oh and StarFox 64.
I wasn't impressed at all by the video.
I think it is the best in all the categories it applies in.
Best stealth game (I LOVE MGS games but TLOU gives me a sense of accomplishment when I use stealth in the harder difficulties).
Best storytelling/pacing
Best Multiplayer
Best graphics (for now, on both ps3 and ps4)
great level design/use of terrain for battle
etc.
So it would be my favorite action/stealth AAA game. ...
Just because other companies overcharge for the RENTAL of games doesn't justify it nor does it entice potential future customers any more than buying-to-own a game would. Two wrongs don't make it right...why should one be considered "unable to afford" the service simply because they see no value in paying for the rental of a game that they could indefinately OWN forever if they just purchased it on ps store or went to gamestop? Even Donald Trump with all his money wouldn'...
The other prices are "cheap" but when compared to retail or even ownership price of digital games, ps now is actually a rip off.
For example, I can buy Catherine for $20 and keep it forever. But to rent it for one week for $8 may not seem so bad, but that forces you to rush. In fact it was the only beta game I put money toward, and I beat it just before my month time was over. I had to rush through it and didnt get the other endings. For the amount I paid for the m...
Journey?! The glorified walking simulation? I had it preordered (was more impressed with free dynamic wallpaper than with game) and came away unimpressed. Loved TGC's Flower game though.
But Journey as best game? No way. "Brothers" was a way better game than that and alot of people who played it think so--but unfortunately not many have played it despite it being offered on ps plus for free for a brief period.
No YOU calm down: They can call it a beta all they want but it costs money to use the beta--a beta that doesn't seem to have any technical issues. So the thing we are "testing" is not the bugs, but is the pricing that they think they can guage out of us. Why pay those prices when the games are cheaper at gamestop--even if we buy them new.
That is why people are disappointed. We wanted backwards compatibility. Not price gouging.
Video from 2010
http://m.youtube.com/watch?...
Koei has been making online dynasty warriors games. No reason why they wouldnt do it for this one. Also even if they didnt want to, Nintendo could have pushed for 8t since they are funding it. Having the multiplayer/co-op be online doesn't hamper the gameplay. There isn't any good reason why it should be omitted. Even if peoplee prefer couch...
Well I think Nintendo could have still requested it if they wanted to. It's their money. Besides, other Koei beat-em-upsfeature 9nline co-op so I doubt that on that basis it was Koei who would make such a foolish move. Mario 3D World on the other hand (a co-op centric modern Ningendo game) neglected to include online multiplayer. Nontheless, the enablers kept on enabling.
Wake me up when Iwata's Nintendo decides to wake up first. He needs to get the portables divisio...
...And the enabling begins. No wonder Nintendo still captivates the hardcore audience and third party devs. So long as we enable pre-historic ideas such as the omission of online multiplayer, inclusion of ethernet ports on consoles, last gen hardware, and dismal networking, enablers will always be there to make sure that Nintendo never has to try any harder. Bravo fans.
@OP-Tigrex: No that would be stupid
No, just that majority of them arr japanese and that market has unfortunately moved onto phones.
At least we still have the "Tales Of" and Persona games.