most console games will always be 30 FPS. you guys think its a bad thing, but you dont realize how much better they can make the graphics by doing this. Doing 30 FPS requires half as much power as 60 FPS.
That means you can make games looking amazing. For most games this is not a problem. Id say 1080p and high graphical fidelity is more important than 60fps (except maybe for shooters).
Dont get upset by these news... just realize the game will look great.
maybe not entirely dishonest though. PS games will cost more than pc games, and there is no internet subscription with PC gaming like xbox live or ps+. So overall if you compare how much your system will cost at the end of its life, you are probably going to be approaching 1000$ anyway if not over it.
So id say its a somewhat fair comparison.
finally someone gets it. Some people are just too hopeful... or believe that devs can magically do anything if they put enough time and effort into it. There are limits to everything.
@frigid... keep dreaming.
it could however run 1080p 35-45 FPS and 64 players.
GTX 480 can do that and the gpu in the ps4 is pretty similar capabilities wise. I think they'd be smart to just drop the FPS cap to a little lower...
might get this for pc
we dismiss wii u because some of us actually understand how underwhelming and underpowered the hardware is in that console. Especially considering the asking price.
pc gamers were saying this all along. if you understand hardware you understand that xbox is an inferior piece of technology for more money. its a bad deal to put frankly.
Console gamers are usually clueless about hardware so they hope for miracle and blindly trust companies to deliver. The world doesn't work that way. If you learn about what powers your games, you wont be so confused any more and could actually make informed decisions.
PS4 will have much...
lots of MS apologists here. This company could take a dump right on their faces and they'd cheer and high five each other.
Whatever suits you kiddos.
its not about stock or resources. its about yields. MS cant make enough. Sony can.
last gen game on next gen systems is still a last gen game. Thats COD4. So dont expect any significant improvements. Expect to play the same game you've been playing for nearly a decade now. totally not worth it... ill stick to bf4.
amazing game
-pc gamer testimony.
Both corporations are motivated by money. The difference is their approach on how they intend to get it from you.
Microsofts approach is to monopolize and force you to adopt ant-consumers policies. They do not care about consumer goodwill or what is best for the customers. They also dont give 2 squats about their customers once the console install base is large enough (aka they stop making exclusive games). This happened with xbox, and then xbox 360. They also were the first ...
Maybe... but if it is then it is only that because DICE /EA realized they can milk consumers by releasing early shooter games from the same franchise.
A lesson they learned from COD and activision. So you really have no one else to blame but Kotick and Co. on this one.
whatever works for you.
Just amazed you guys dont get bored of paying for the same game year after year.
@jismas
" could write a whole essay on you idiots but i can't be bothered "
actually you are the idiot because of this line right here: "And so what if the PS4 is negligibly more powerful".
The difference isnt negligible. Obviously you dont understand hardware if you believe what you wrote. The GPU on PS4 is going to whoop MS in the nuts.
GLHF with your overpriced/underpowered system.
...
its good that it can be upgraded from ps3 to ps4... but the real question id like to raise is this:
can all of the copies of the game be delivered to junkyards instead of stores, and burned in a huge pile, so everyone could stop talking about old ass uninspired games that lack innovation, graphical prowess, and "soul".
lmfao
so you point out all of the issues, but ignore the completely flat and fake appearance of BLOOD in the third image?
I mean damn that looks bad.
of course 60 FPS is better. Im a pc gamer so i dont deny that. all im saying is that, if you are going to have to choose between 60 fps and better fidelity, which one would you go for? Obviously answer will vary upon individual, but most devs have decided to go for higher visual fidelity.
You cant have it both ways as a console gamer.
Although it would be cool if they made it so you could choose... performance setting... 60 fps, worse visuals. Quality setting...