game journalism is in a lot worse shape than the Vita.
i agree ritsu except this site loves idiot unsupported Sony doom articles. now a pro Sony product article appears and suddenly a question of the reliability of the writing takes center stage.
no siree bob what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
a game that leaves out a common feature like inverted aim, has a producer say they will fix it, then sends emails from support saying they have no intention of fixing it. yeah goty.
no thanks bethesda.
exactly right. ocelot liquid vamp, none of them were villains. zero the patriots and the system were the real bad guys.
unless it was a argument about copyrights no publisher is gonna shelve a game that was 99% done. They are gonna try an make back some of the lost investment even if they gotta pull the game an give it to another team.
An it wasnt creative direction cause the publisher has people onsite for a project like this as well as lucasarts people. Na, I gotta call bs on the 99% comment.
and ridiculous nonstop cheap articles from the examiner can't save game journalism.
black ops declass > anything published by the examiner
cause its kotaku writing another anti-sony hit piece.
the sun rises in the east, politicians all lie, kotaku willing to print anything that shows sony in a bad light. how predictable
if you realized it why mention it. plenty of games do this when its really a alpha. not the fake alpha that's really a late beta that we normally see but a real alpha.
exactly. game judgement just stated they are biased. no need to ever look at that site again. not ever.
valve and cd projekt. every version of witcher and witcher 2 are loaded with extras.
ha ha ha poor try. do you think sony is the only major company making 4k tvs? apparently and you would be wrong. LG is a major company an they are coming in with their first set, their first set under 20k. sorry but you dudes are wrong. prices will plummet quick.
the grannies that made the wii a big seller arent going to go for this. ninty seriously miscalculated. got nothing to do with liking or disliking, its the market.
tap what? yeah thas the last we hear of him.
so the assumption is that ps3 owners couldn't have owned a xbox. jus cause they owned a ps2, you know the second time sony brought a new format to gaming, doesn't mean no xbox 1. 4k is sony continuing the format trend.
they look good but a engine is only as good as its tools. no tools means no one will license it. let's hope he is workin hard on those.
easier said than done? thas the point dude. peeps act like devs can change crap to suit them at the snap of a finger. even for devs its work an time an money. an as it was said they shouldn't cave to screamers.
no you are wrong. are is the present indicative and second person singular of be. you should have used is, which is third person singular. he chose do which is present singular first person instead he chose does which is third person singular present indicative. you were nitpicking and got what being arrogant usually gets folks. just be a man own your mistake eat some humble pie an don't do it again. i screw up a lot but at least i know it.
peeps that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
http://n4g.com/news/1060702...
sorry dudes but I've played some phone/tablet games and I can't think of one that holds a candle to vita games. there are more game capable phones on the market now than there will ever be vitas so where's all these titles that will kill the vita.
look how long game capable phones have been out an no blockbuster cept angry birds. if any console had gone that long without a bunch of blockbuster hits they would be kicking the dirt over them and putting up a headston...