I see the SDF out in force as ever on this site. The game looks sweet, a hell of a lot sweeter than the primitive graphics of Halo 3. Killzone 2 won't be able to match this online, even tho it was a lot of fun, it was nowhere near as smooth. The graphics may be sweet on KZ2 and the single player is damn good but the multiplayer can't handle all the stuff going on most of the time. If there's a ton of stuff going on it's virtually unplayable. Oh wait, I'm wrong because this is not favourable t...
U can't have sweet graphics on a multiplat? Get ur phallus out of your ps3 for a minute. So FF 13 doesn't look like it has sweet graphics? Cos that's what every1 who's played it thinks. I get it if you don't understand.
Strange how it's mostly PS3 owners commenting on this. I didn't realise it affected them...It's embarrassing that despite it not affecting you that you'd come here 2 tell people how bad it'l be despite not ever seeing either version in most cases. And you talk about multiple discs being an issue? About 10 seconds for every 15 hours of gameplay? That's an issue. So what happens when you decide you want 2 change games? Do you get angry that you have 2 get off your lazy asses? If you spend so mu...
The only thing funny is how butthurt the fanboys that constitute this site are that this game is utterly sh!te. Did people not see the gameplay videos cos they were shocking. How could you get hyped about something that looked so awful?
Do any people with a 360 actually give a sh!t about changing a disc which takes 5 seconds? I've never heard any1 say they do. Yet somehow people without a 360 are bothered...truly embarrassing. If you actually care that you're wasting 5 seconds you need a life
Squire and you ps3 fanboy's need go and play mass effect 2 right now and then take your comments and shove em, it has nothing to do with disk size, Squire are just bloody lazy pure and simple? If the excuse is about 360's disk size holding holding back the ps3 version, well I Have played all the major release on ps3 and on 360 and mass effect 2 destroys them all, and in every area of development? so the argument is mute we could have done with out blue ray for this gen cos dvd has proven it i...
Well considering it's got 2 9/10's that's unlikely. But UC2 is 2 good 2 surpass any time soon. This looks pretty damn good tho, Fahrenheit was quality until the very end and this game blatantly won't go mental like that did, so should be pretty incredible
Yeah that's utter bull, if you did towns on the old ones with ease why are they suddenly impossible now? Surely putting the same things in them but making them HD isn't that hard is it? A few shops? So Mass effect 1 had the citadel which had loads 2 do, but 2 years later and many more years of development and you can't make a single town in this?! I hope Versus has towns, cos I'l be pretty disappointed if it doesn't
I've only got 8 meg too and don't really see a problem. I absolutely own at Uncharted 2 online and it's very rare to get lag. Anyone want a spanking as proof then feel free PSN ID die_fiend
Because you like dated games?
Or this reviewer is a retard?
Your opinion is irrelevant as you're ridiculously biased. If this sort of game was on the 360 it wouldn't be innovative apparently. And what have 360 exclusives compared 2 UC2 graphics got 2 do with this article? Nothing, you're just in love with a console, I hope you're ashamed. Just get over your 360 woes and stop caring, you are currently an embarrassment
I've played both and can tell you that you're talking sh*t. It really is washed out. It's framerate is also poor compared 2 the 360 but if I'm honest it isn't really an issue. I played the PS3 version first and wasn't complaining but once I played the 360 version it straight away looks better and is a lot smoother, especially during climax attacks. But maybe your fanboy goggles or general ignorance means you don't notice the drop in framerate. It's like me saying the PS3 port of the Orange Bo...
Funny how many people are wetting themselves at this. Guarantee Bayonetta will have got better reviews. The combat on GOW is so shallow compared. The graphics looks sweet but they really don't look like UC2 which smashes everything.
Lol, so the story of Killzone 2 was amazing was it? And the fact the graphics were amazing didn't help did it? Anyway, these screens make UC2 look so much better than GOW3 which they probably will be. Shame hardly any1 plays online cos it's got an immense multiplayer
You don't understand because you were probably the only thing mediocre about the demo. The rave reviews are because people think it's amazing. The demo was really short and you were probably as shocking at it as you are at forming opinions
Edit: Well you shouldn't really pass any sort of judgement on something you've never played. The demo isn't the game so to say you don't understand the rave reviews is ridiculous given you haven't played the game. The reviewers loved it beca...
I know it's a year old, they're taking ages localising it. U say it's come leaps and bounds, I hope it looks a lot better than this one. It being a 'first gen PS3 game' isn't an excuse. Surely MGS4 is one of those? I remember seeing screenshots and thinking it looked pretty amazing but maybe I just haven't seen the right footage cos what I've seen looks poor. And 1080p? Really doesn't matter when the graphics aren't good to begin with. And I know it's got online and community, that's no excus...
Because you've had no sleep for days?
Dual wielding was Hasselhoff in Halo 3, purely cos picking up guns was done poorly. U should be able to pick up guns without holding down a button. Also, why put melee as B by default making it impossible to aim while pressing it? It makes no sense. It's like having X as shoot. This game looks pretty sweet tho so it won't matter it dual wielding is omitted