while I agree with you, and the fact that paying for the kids doesn't automatically make them a killing machine... this business model is for F2P games... Is this game F2P???
Sorry, but soon EA will just let you buy kills -_-
How can they get away with making that kind of a statement? Aren't banks/oil companies entitled to sue EA for saying something like that?
Whatever it is... It'l cost you at least 10 bucks. Thanks EA! -_-
lol It's easy to tell it's an april fools joke just because the date is right there lol
if you want to get a point across, perhaps hold out on buying the next cod game?? This is a little dumb if you ask me....
I'll say it once again, I refuse to pay for anymore Bioware products. They have continually dumbed down their product in order to generate more sales. It sucks that EA has done this to Bioware. I really really hate EA -_-
What a slap in the face....
PS. the twitter confirmation is a bunch of BS... Of course they're going to deny it -_- lol
I think publishing costs is the last thing a publishing company actually looks at when they're picking their prices... It's all price/demand curves... if there is a good demand for it, you can charge more... That's economy 101.
I highly doubt the cost of production is the reason why call of duty games are 59.99 each year. They could lower their price to 39.99 and still make billions.
While I don't agree that the ending should be fixed... I also believe that the ending should have been better in the first place. If they come up with new endings, I'm not going to care because i already sold my game. The series is already ruined for me. I don't really care anymore.
But hey, that's just me.
I agree. But I also believe that the developers are games should be respectful enough to us gamers to give us a quality product and not take us to be idiots.
some games can be successful just because of marketing... that doesn't necessarily mean you should take advantage of this and sell a marketable yet disappointing product. Gamers aren't stupid, we should all be aware that the ending was rushed and the game should have been pushed back. Whether you agree that they ...
I didn't need to read this to realize that the ending was not made by the same people who were responsible for the side missions. The side missions were fantastic, the main missions were nothing special (the ending especially)
As much as I respect Ken because of how great of a artist he is... I could care less what he has to say about the topic. He makes games that are completely different. He writes a novel while ME fans expected Bioware to write a universe. I think Bioware overall relied too much on how good the other two ME games were and ended up failing in ME3 because they didn't strive to achieve something they hadn't already achieved in ME3.
Bioware's older games are good because...
lol she completely disproved her 43% of gamers are girls after saying the thing about angry birds. lol I'm sorry, but playing angry birds doesn't make you a gamer, if that were the case, just about all of america's population would be considered a gamer lol
Witcher 2 is awesome!
Here is what I'm pro for:
-Create more endings, leave the single ending that you created in the first place.
-Make it free
-make the endings distinctively different
-have more of our choices affect the endings
-Give us more characters (for free, 6 is too little)
This is what I'm against
-replace the current SINGLE ending with another SINGLE ending
-make us pay for it
-make more MP DLC ...
I bought my copy new for 30 bucks, and I sold it to some idiot for 40 after I beat it and realized the game sucks a$$!. Poor kid lol
still better than what Bioware made.
Original >>>> EA's copy:
WOW >>>>> SWTOR
COD >>>>> BF
Steam >>> Origin
Starcraft >>> Command an Conquer
Skyrim/Fable >> Amaleur
God of War >>>> Dante's Inferno
and the list goes on
Now i'll be honest, BF was awesome before EA thought it was a good idea to try and make it compete with cod -_-
Jessica Nigri > Kaley Cuoco
The fact that there is only 1 single ending is enough reason for the ending to not be okay. It's Mass Effect, there is never just a single way of resolving something. Ever since the original was released in 2007, all quests and game conclusions have always had different endings.
I'm sorry, but if the ending of ME3 is good to you, then you were never playing ME3 for the right reasons to begin with. I could care less if there was multiple endings and I didn't like a...
This won't fix anything... The ending is just bad.... I don't expect them to be able to fix it, they messed up... There was just logical fails... like:
SPOILER:
The ghost kid says that he created the reapers (a synthetic) to prevent the biotics from being wiped out by other synthetics by wiping themout -_-
What about the fact that there is no choices in the ending? all three choices lead to the exact same ending (with a different expl...