way to stand up to the mob :)
sad state of affairs when, even when a person makes a valid point, they get downvoted because of allegiances. One mob yelling at another mob.
He is right: 360 is doing fine.
The question is, how long can they hold out until they buckle against the newer, superior ps3 hardware. It's just a matter of time. Hopefully MS will do something noble (yeah right :P) and lift their tariffs for multi disc games to calm the situation for at l...
that is what is messing everything up, along with MS using their proprietary HDD solutions.
it would have been even better than that as PC only.
What we need is for devs to STOP working for parity between ports. Give each system the game that tailors to the system's strengths
nice
If MS didnt back themselves into a corner with proprietary hard drive options.
It will be interesting to see, though, how ISPs react when we ARE beginning to download 20+GB games... lots of people will hit their bandwidth cap very quickly.
Cell processor frustrating developers.
There will always be things that seem like a hindrance to developers simply because they can't find an easy solution right away.
This is why the PS3 has had some questionable ports, and this is why we will see, more and more, the 360 get some questionable multiplats as devs get used to the extra space blu ray affords.
It's BIASED. Not BIAS.
One can have A BIAS, or BE BIASED. You cannot be bias.
If you're going to throw the word around all day, at least understand what it means and how to use it.
It was never meant to be a great FPS...since SOCOM is TPS not FPS.
research moar.
still have it installed, in fact.
Diablo 3 looks like a joke IMO. I keep trying to get interested in the game. But it seems like one thing after another, theyve been eliminating the little things that made diablo 1 and 2 so great.
in Fable II ... man, how about you clowns patch in some ACTUAL co op before doing a sequel.
What techniques devs have developed in order to draw the extra frame. It might not be a 50% decrease depending on the techniques they employ. Just as there are different methods of AA and moblur, some more efficient than others. The downside is that retrofitting a game to run in 3d is most likely a huge task, so legacy support for old games might be limited to tvs that use algorithms to fake the depth (kind of like upscaling, but converting from 2d to 3d)
But why would they give us the goods when they can bleed us for more money.
The TVs coming out now use either the plastic polarized glasses you see in theatres, or the active shutter style powered glasses that nvidia currently employs in its 3d setups with the IR beacon.
I wish they would just cut to the chase and push for naked eye 3d (the naked eye displays are still MASSIVELY expensive and you really only see them in the film industry), but this way they get to s...
much appreciated :)
What happened to gamers loving gaming?!?!?!
It turned into a "my investment was clearly a better choice than your investment"
It's all just entertainment. One could have invested in a bowflex and gotten out of their parents' basement.
We are all gamers, and spend a lot of time gaming, why can't we just be happy that we all get such amazing games?
sorry, author guy, lost all credibility right there. Even haters know there were some of the best experiences in gaming history found on that platform. Just because it didnt finish first in sales doesnt mean that it should be discounted. N64 and Dreamcast are 2 of my fav consoles, neither "won their war"
Incredible games on both.
(dont even get me started on why the rest of the article is lame)
we cant have nice things.
if it was?
I will invariably hear a bunch of douchebags shouting about something.
So everyone that uses either service is a douchebag?
This is why we have mute and party chat functions. There will always be idiots with mics crying for attention. Bigger userbase = greater likelihood for idiots with mics.
between PCs and consoles in general than there are between xbox360 and ps3 platform wise.
PCs are multitasking machines that have been around for decades resulting in a userbase that makes even the massive Wii userbase look barren. It's a MUCH less even comparison than ps3 vs xbox360; which were released fairly close together and are far closer in terms of userbase.
Getting disagrees?
Weren't the same texture resources were used?
Output resolution is gimped on 360 version. (the lower final resolution obviously means the textures won't look as nice on screen...)