CompGeek

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 17950

I can't think of anything not wrong with it. It's an insult to PC gamers.

6835d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

UE3 = old

If I may put it bluntly.

6837d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Thaaanks! I know users have to give you negative feedback, I was just wondering why I would have gotten any. =S

6839d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, modding does not mean cheating. You are confused.

Also an edit: Anyone got a clue why I have only 4 bubbles? I never post a remark that bashes a console, only my comments on a news story... i dont get it.

6839d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm not anti-corporation, corporations are part of free market economy. I just think the restrictions of digital distribution and uses are way beyond excessive.

6839d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

w/e, it will never look great.

6839d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I for one LOVE electronics hacking and always like good news from the console hacking scene.

6839d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Woohoo, deathstar for the win.

6840d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wow, I'll tell you right now that's the PC version.

6845d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

We go from realistic WW2 combat to a totally fictional pathetic war storyline? Call of Duty what happened?!

6848d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

LOL at you! +1

6848d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Freakin nice! I'm glad I'm gonna get to play this! I Played #3 a lot on PS1

6848d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Halo 3 is nothing remotely close to a blockbuster. The graphics are, if anything, less than hoped for, and the gameplay is just a tweaked mix of Halo 1 + 2 (which is, im sure, what everyone wanted anyway).

Crysis is using cutting edge graphics and physics to produce better visuals than any video game ever before.

It's more than clear which game is a blockbuster.

Halo 3 isn't going to look even remotely close to Crysis visually. Halo 3 isn't even...

6852d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

Give me Gears, Command and Conquer, Bioshock, The Darkness, Call of Jaurez, Brothers in Arms, F.E.A.R., Just Cause, Alan Wake. THAT is fun gameplay. There is not a single game on the Wii that I would ever want to play. And yes, graphics DO matter, a lot.

6853d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Umm, a journalist for PlayStation Universe? Let's see if I can guess what this says before reading it. Sure doesn't say the 360 is better.

EDIT: I must somewhat revise my statement. The only thing I don't agree with is where he compares the CPU power simply by clockspeed and number of cores, which is not a viable performance comparison, whether the end result is correct in this case or not.

6853d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

And for every one of those reasons there are 10 more why we SHOULD dismiss the Wii. I dislike pointless articles.

6853d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Just be glad the PS3 is getting GTA IV, PS3 wasn't missing anything without this game, it's a buggy piece of crap. This is definitely the buggiest game on the 360.

6853d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Half Life 2 is EVRYTHING the hype says it is, however, the texture memory limiatation is pretty obvious right there. I had higher resolution textures when I played HL2 in 2005 on my 6600 GT. I wish we werent limited to a paltry 512mb total memory in the consoles.

6854d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

My 8800 GTS should do OK ^^

6854d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Does anyone have a, umm, technical explanation for this?

6854d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment