I am honoured to receive PS3 fanboy rage and inappropriate moderation

commodore64

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 36270

the ps3 has just released its two biggest games for 2009.
This looks to be the sales peak for the ps3 in Japan this year.

Please quote me on that.

I am concerned about the rest of the year for sony.
A price cut is desperately needed.

6155d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

why the ps3 wasn't in that list?

Hasn't it lost $4 billion+

That's enough to bail out GM!

crikey.

6155d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Oh FFS cajun.

Ps3 bioshock had AN EXTRA YEAR to get it right.

An EXTRA YEAR!
(and it was still worse....)

Please do us all a favour and stop making excuses for the ps3.

6155d ago 3 agree18 disagreeView comment

I was expecting a lot more sales so far for this game.

It is already down 50% in the second week!

That would imply a further 50% drop off from the intitial 50% in the third week. (25% of week1)

and in the fourth week.... and so on....you get the picture.

I really was expecting better sales for KZ2.

6156d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

@ tpa

Dude.
I don't know which stinks more:

Your armpit or your comment?

6156d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

More food for thought.

The "superior exclusives" argument is moot.

As we cannot objectively compare exclusives, the conclusion remains subjective. Hence it is pointless.

Moreover, Has the ps3 got a superior Halo3?
No it doesn't.
Has the 360 got a superior KZ2?
No, it doesn't.

Comparing Exclusives is extreme fanboy stuff.

The only objective measure of exclusives is the metacritic score. ...

6156d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

A more pertinent point to observe would be that ps3 users proudly talk about the superior movies that one can watch on the ps3.

360 users proudly talk about the superior multiplat games that they can play on their console.

Which begs the question, did we buy our respective consoles to play games or to play movies?

Food for thought, indeed.

:)

6157d ago 11 agree8 disagreeView comment

There is nothing like clear objectivity to sort out the fanboys.

In this case, the 360 version is clearly better.
Undisputably better.

That makes ... now... hmmm.... *calculates*... uh...
98% better multiplats for the 360 in all objective comparisons, including the most recent ones.

Crikey! That's a lot.

Just as well I am not a die-hard ps3 fan?

6157d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

Can we just stay on topic in the gamerzone?

This is a story about RE5 and the comparison between the game on ps3 and 360.

Why did you mention kz2?
Did it hurt so much to see yet another multiplat perform better on the 360?

(Game13a13y Reported as off-topic.)

6157d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

.... so sony offers free netflix service, but charges an arm and a leg for the mandatory inclusion of bluray.

yeah. cool. not.

6157d ago 5 agree23 disagreeView comment

PS3 in third place?

right, as expected.

*goes back to sleep*

6157d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

@ bathyj

Is a bit silly of you to comment on goon's gf when your girlfriend is laughing about your erectile dysfunction behind your back!

No lie.
She told me last night when she was earning her keep.

;)

6157d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

no sorry.... it seems you are so passionate about the ps3 that you didn't read what i said.

I said:"what really counts is current gen profitability and beating the previous gen iteration. "

look at the ps3 sales.
Compared to the equivalent ps2 sales it is failing HARD!

look at the ps3 profitability.
Compared to the equivalent ps2 profits it is failing HARD!

Please, if you must reply to my comment, then reply appropriate...

6157d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ above ^^^

yeah, or perhaps it is "who has the smallest c*ck" and needs to do a lot of compensatory DAMAAAAGE CONTROOOOOL !

(like this article, for example)

6157d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

well there you go then.

Once again
We can buy the same game with slightly better graphics on the 360 for $199+game

Or we can buy the same game with slightly inferior graphics on the ps3 for $399+game

Just like i said.

6157d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

We can buy the same game with slightly better graphics on the 360 for $199+game

Or we can buy the same game with slightly inferior graphics on the ps3 for $399+game

It just don't make any sense!

6158d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

the 360 version looks better.

Unless you ask a sony fanboy.
Then they magically look the same.

6158d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

well to be fair....we did have 2+years of "wait wait" from the sony camp prior to that.

Yet still ... third place?
oh that's right. "wait wait" til 2012, right?

6158d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

what really counts is current gen profitability and beating the previous gen iteration.

On both those counts, MS is winning with the 360.

What is more telling however, is that Sony is losing big-time on both counts with the ps3.

Just the facts, once again, like it or not.

6158d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

Pity none of the console fanboys will ever get to grips with it!

6158d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment