what Sony delays ?
i cannot think of anything Sony has delayed, i can think of blog sites that say sony has delayed things like home but how can Sony have delayed home when they have never given a release date for it ?
how about a tip that will make games on the wii look next gen instead of last gen :)
'9.0 Lasting Appeal:
Co-op's still a mystery, but the breadth of possibility makes for a game with vast replay potential, regardless of basic length.'
so they don't know how multiplayer works and it's a short game, but it still scores highly! lol...
don't get me wrong i would love to be able to play this on the PS3, but it's just funny how they bend over backwards to give 360 games a good score and pull in all sorts of arbitrary rubbish to put a PS3 game down....
this holiday season is not about a console war, it's about Sony establishing it's identity for going forward in 2009. i think that the PS3 will sell well, but the credit crunch has definitely made it unlikely that parents will pick up a PS3 for their kids. the Arcade is likely to do a lot better...
but there's the problem for MS. they are going to shoot themselves in the foot for 2009 and i believe that's what Sony wants them to do. by creating a larger install base based on pric...
really? you mean like Halo didn't?
Sony are set for the future. Capcom just announced their own PSN store and others are going to follow. this firmware just made the PS3 the only box you need in your livingroom.
lol... admittedly it has sharp textures, but after that... what... er... oh yes, MOSS on the cars. DVD is crippling the games on the 360 and Cell is showing 360 how to use AI and physics.
there is only one console to buy this generation and even YOU know which it is... here's a few clues: HD movies on Blu-ray and Online, Free online, better production value, 0.2 failure rate, and slicker, more stylish.
Razor, if you are going to call out on the Trolls, i would advise you to try to practice what you preach. i can feel your hurt though. we have the exclusives, you have the exclusive DLC LOL... it's a pity MS didn't put a HD-DVD in the 360, then you would have seen the benefits of extra storage space just like PS3 owners.
what that got to do with the argument? is it that: paying has been so instilled into the 360 owners mindset that they are afraid to even look at a PSN game. i urge you to try out some of the games (and i don't mean the simpler arcade games which are STILL better than Live games)you will begin to wonder how MS managed to brainwash you. you get what you pay for? no you don't! wake up!
and where is your WOW quality game? we'll have dozens soon, starting with Agency and Free realms ...
seriously though... and i know that this sounds like 360 bashing. it's not even comparable now. PSN is slicker, quicker, bigger, better and FREE... how can the 360 owner still be sooooo blinkered?
it's just so obvious now how much better the games are on PSN. it's so vast that it's like comparing PS2 to the 360. i guess the limited download size has a lot to do with it... perhaps if 360 owners pay a little more they will get games that reach 1GB... and then a lot more to reach the 2 - 5GB we get on PSN.
@ Razar.
you get what you pay for? enlighten me. try sticking to the games because i've noticed in all these debates that the 360 owners avoid that subject like the plague. where is your Blu-ray quality RAC or your DVD quality Siren? you see, i like arcade games, but i prefer them to be of the highest quality. list the reason why you are happy to part with your money for something i get for free... i don't get it.
if HOME is an answer to Live then what is the new Avatar system on the 360?! Avatars are an answer to HOME! that's the fact. PSN is more than an answer to LIVE and HOME makes Avatars look ridiculous.
be thoughtful PS3 owners, remember, for every disagree a 360 owner dies... R.I.P
one minute of silence please (no sniggering!)
............................. ............................... ............................... ............................... ..............ah............... ............................... ............................... ........................ahah... ............................... ............................... .............................
9.6 is a brilliant score, but it still bothers me somehow... when you read the review, they are gushing about the sheer innovation and structure of the game. they write as if they think it's the second coming. i would have expected a perfect 10 from them.
gears 2 looks exactly the same as gears 1 and that sucked
IGN:
quote:
'Sound
We love the soundtrack - quirky, poppy and perfectly suited. The environmental audio mapping is great too. A bonus point for 'Best Use of Stephen Fry in a Game'.
where in that comment do they suggest that the sound only deserves a, 8.5? this is stupid to say the least and from what IGN said about sound above, it should have got 10
it's odd because i've been in the Beta from the start and i haven't come across any levels at all that contained a penis.
normally 9/10 would be an excellent score, but for LBP it's ridiculous! LBP is the biggest thing to come to gaming ever
LBP was discuss on The Write Stuff this morning, it's been on Jonathon Ross, BBC and CNN, LBP is getting hype like no other game