chris235

Member
CRank: 5Score: 52480

sure. why would someone who disliked the first one now suddenly be interested in the same in green? this game will go the route of every forced online game. within a few weeks only a small percentage of people will be still playing the next grindfest.

2588d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

easy. the xoxbox division just needs to return to the gamer market. right now it‘s not a gaming console in the first place. it just so happens to also play games. that‘s not enough.

2588d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

all the 12 year old girls went on to the next thing

2588d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

what do you say? micky$oft going back to the gaming/console business? i am not convinced of this claim.

2589d ago 3 agree9 disagreeView comment

i don‘t know why people are supporting such products. or why bloggers are still advertizing this.

2589d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

this dud is getting dlc? wow.

2589d ago 2 agree17 disagreeView comment

this is a simple port if the original, not the remake, right? because i can see the 20+ year old game run - albeit not very smoothly - on this nonconsole. while the remake will be completely out of the question, i guess.

2589d ago 19 agree22 disagreeView comment

the anthem community seems to be pretty delusional.

2589d ago 12 agree8 disagreeView comment

huh? people are playing this for the grind. grind is repetition by definition. in no way they need new content, really. they got an infinite engine with anthem, otherwise why would anyone had picked this up in the first place? it was clear before the game was released what it is. a grindfest.

2590d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

so why trying it time and again? ah, to rip off the gamer that still believes in hype. way to do business.

2590d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

physical copies are pretty much dead. without taking digital distribution into account these kind of blogposts are zero-infos.

2590d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

well, after 4 there was no good resident evil title anymore, so...

2590d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

i can‘t believe these games are still a thing. the market is oversaturated with these microtransactions-ridden cashgrabs.

2590d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

why would they? just because anthem was off to a rough start? i have read so many comments these days where gamers stated that they will pick it up as soon as it‘s discounted „that‘ll show them“. actually the only thing these gamers are achieving is that this dud will make money eventually by buying it when it fits their wallet. this is completely the wrong signal. but i guess this train of thought is too difficult to grasp for most.

2591d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

i stopped playing lootershooters, mmos and games with forced online content years ago, because these games are built around grind, which may be cool for kids, but as a working entity i just don‘t have the time anymore to reach the grindy goals of these games.

also, dragon quest 11 the aftergame comes to mind. the kingdom hearts „aftergame“ is still cool, i feel the grind in this game is overseeable how long it will take.

basically, i‘d like to achieve pl...

2591d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

and there i was thinking they released a new game but it‘s only a touchgrab.

2592d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

what? these kind of games all are the same? unfinished and generic? now i‘m surprised.

really, trying something over and over again and hoping for a different outcome is the definition of insanity. ignore these kind of games and they‘ll go away. throwing tantrums about it each and every time such a game gets released changes exactly nothing.

2592d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

less people, more genericness in their products. the industry crash already happened. we‘re in the midst of it.

2594d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

these both are not even competing in the same market. most superfluous blogpost ever.

2594d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

oh, surprise, surprise! (not)

2594d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment