word!
yeah but people love to be insane: trying and trying and always hoping for a different outcome.
why isn‘t this blogpost labelled as an opinion piece?
This is strange. They didn‘ refund No Man‘s Sky when it was released as a barebone Shell of a Game. Anyway, it is still beyond me why the business model of Lootetshooters still gets embraced by people. What happened to gaming standards?
reaity check: if the xoxbox division does not return to be a gaming division nothing will prevent the xoxbox from losing again.
these muscles are not well developped because of the size of spiderman they oretty mich ignored the repetitive gameplay with their lame side missions. the main campaign was stellar. i‘m saying the game would have been better off when they lost the open world aspect and instead created a tight linear experience.
i think this argument in the headline is wrong on every conceivanle level.
havent touched the online mode once. why would i? i am a gamer because i want to have fun and escape a little bit. having to deal with humans in my games is pretty much the opposite of that.
„I’m Enjoying Anthem And I Don’t Know Why“
seems like your are among the target group, then. no need to blog about it.
not interested in this very dated concept of an open word, sorry.
one does not need 300 hours to realize what a dud is.
one also does not sink 300 hours into a product and the complain about it.
seems like onlinelootershooterfans are not into fun they only want the next generic experience without much content. otherwise there is no reason anyone would pick this up.
i‘d like a new protagonist, a new game mechanic, a new approach to the repetitiveness if the whole gameplay. in short: i don‘t want more of the same i want a real effort. will pass on the sequel, didn‘t think the first one wass all that good except for the optics.
if you compare your rating with other 9/10 games, do you really see this game in the same regions? if yes, i can‘t take this review seriously and will certainly not even read it. a 9/10 is usually a near flawless product.
you are really overestimating reviews here. the vast majority of gamers does not read them. when a game fails it fails because it‘s bad. but this fact is hard to accept when a dud got greenlighted and the sales are not as expected. if only reviews made a difference the switch would have never become a thing.
reviews do not much to impact negative sales results. the vast majority of gamers does not read reviews. if a game fails it fails because it‘s not good. there are also no wrong release dates. only low efforts or shady business models that want more money from a bad product because there is marketing.
that reboot was a failure. way to nicetalk a dud.
call of duty? wow. this is a real low standard even for ps plus.
you do realize that they are only counting half the cake by only listing the digital sales. (and this only fir japan).
in these days omitting either digital sales or physical sales in an info blogpost is like a zero-info but wanting clickrevenue for it.
people quite obviously don‘t care they just want to experience the next generic thing. graphics is not amongst what they seek. they seek the thrill of opening the next lootbox.