Games in the 70s could have gameplay as fun as any 90s rated game but lacked a good story and had some technical issues and maybe mediocre graphics
but gameplay itself could be fun as hell. SOD is a good example of this. 80 rated often time have the graphics and the gameplay but usually too short or or was lack in 1 specific thing that stopped it from rating higher. While 90 games will have a great story, graphics, no noticeable bugs and good gameplay.
70,80 or 90...
Ooohhh So that's why Naughty Dog was doing and acting like they were when someone gave average reviews. Smh
Does it matter? Sells make your purchases more enjoyable?
Really? That's surprising cause there's been little hype. It shows you the pandemic has been nothing but good for gaming
Spot on Fox, idk why people supporting them BS decisions. $70 games etc. We see MS tried some BS and Xbox gamers shut it down instantly. PS gamers take whatever Sony put out or takes away from them.
Exactly I always turn vibration off to save battery and due to it being a distraction in competitive games. Ppl saying it's so advanced but if you take away heptic feedback would ppl say the same thing? Better battery, joysticks, etc is what I'd call advanced.
Lmao, I see you got jokes
My mega PC is ready...
Facts, it slowly started changing with Ps3 and as someone that grew up PS it was a tough pill to swallow. They started to get their act together but have fallen on bad habits again.
He's ruined PS
Yes, cause something can be extremely fun and good too many but not be a blockbuster hit. Like Foxtrot said picking a remake of a recent game over a sequel of a decent game is messed up. Days gone had its moments and potential which many enjoyed and like even with its flaws, a sequel could nail it perfectly but that looks dead cause it wasn't a blockbuster. It's bad logic to have
If I seen 2 powerhouses team up and dominate my favorite platform I'd cringe too lol
It'd a 1 hit kill on armorless demons. Chief has on a super suit with an energy shield that can eat a shot from a sniper with 0 damage. A chainsaw can not 1 hit kill Chief. Anyone that has played or know Halo will tell you this.
Energy sword> chainsaw if those to got into a battle the energy sword would slice thru that chainsaw with ease. You comparing 2552 technology weapons to 18th century tech and saying the mechanical weapons of the 1800-1900s would beat year 250...
It would be tight if there was a Halo infinite side missions and you come across doom guy and he tags along with you then after a few missions together and build a relationship he gets turned into the Flood lol. And MC goes, "1 monster he couldn't kill"
My damn profile is named ChiefJohn 117 and he tells me i must haven't finish the games 🤣 lmao
Chainsaw? Chief deals with 10 foot aliens with energy swords and you think a chain saw is stopping chief? Could it even get thru his energy shield and armor? Chief would take an inceration cannon and dust doom guy away with the wind
The Flood alone is tougher and more mental insanity than anything the doom guy has fought. Chief was in a grave mind hive nearly eaten by the MF. Has watch his team become the most vile thing in the universe. has survive falling from space.
Has barely escaped 2-3 planets exploding
Has be in cryotube for a huge portion of his life and treated like a robot. Was kidnapped as a child and gone thru cruel training and experiments to become a super solider.
Doom guy fough...
Gamepass lineup is 1 search away I'm not linking you to ish we all already know
No gonna lie this is dumb. Everyone knows the value of gamepass. Making article about how hurt you are ps5 doesn't have such value is laughable to me.