some common sense. Is that too much to ask?
You should add /Sarcasm at the end.
So after reading your name, people don't get confused.
Yeah, I would like split-screen even with lowered graphics.
If they have the space for it, then why not?
Having 10% less graphics does not matter if you have like 50% more fun playing it.
It just really adds value to package. I think that some great split-screen games can be made, but people just don't try.
Natal would plummet.
I'll just wait for the official news but it does look likely.
WTF?
Who seriously though there was.
You named 6, not 9 exclusives, lol.
Don't tell me that you count games on PC, as exclusives. LOL
Mass Effect 1, 2, 3 and 4. :)
HAHAHAHAH, OMG, so funny.
"MS charging for Facebook & Twitter/I could do this on my PS3 for free since day 1"
cheers Blaze from gamer zone.
is much more useful than this.
They need to go beyond this.
An arm and leg.
But how would you play Natal then? LOL
It's really a amazing feat.
single player+ co-op+ multiplayer co-op
Also lol at Splinter Cell and Alan Wake. :)
The first Assassin's Creed really turned me off.
There was practically nothing to do, and lackluster combat.
"The TGS 2009 demo is almost running at 30fps consistently, and we're hoping that the final version will be locked at that rate for the majority of the game"
Yep, Yep. PP is running back to his cave.
The use of 3D space in a lot of games is limited, especially hardcore ones.
So, Natal is not any better.
So you're saying that Natal would work exactly like a eye-toy?
Or a Xbox vision camera?
What's the point of making Natal in the first place if it doesn't use the 3D space of gaming that it was meant for?
The simple point is that quality keeps increasing on PS3 year by year, because of excellent first party developers, blu-ray and the cell.