Yeah that would be good mate. Although i played all Mass Effects, they did have some sort of on screen comic for people to catch up on the story, although i may be wrong, i think they charged people for it as part of dlc, or was it free ?
i suppose there's no point in getting this if i haven't played either of the first two ?
nah i'm not getting this. Ubisoft have let console players down big time. This game will be all pimped up and better on the pc, but on next gen that's not good enough, nowhere near it. I've also heard the pc version is substantially better, and i don't have a pc, nor will i get one. All that freakin money they spend on adverts could have been used on the game.
I really don't like how cars just bounce off of other cars instead of crashing. That's no use. That sort of thing isn't even last gen, that's a gen or two before that. I'm not keen on paying full price for a game that has such a flawed mechanic. The money they spend on advertising, and the cars are dodgems ?
Get a full game. Best maps on bf are the ones that come with the game, plus china rising.
I prefered max payne 3. It never sold enough copies, so i very much doubt we will see another one. Cash is king and all that. I think gta 5 had more potential that what we got. It wasn't a let down, but i think it gets over hyped.
UK prices :-
weeks a go a xb1 with kinect and digital titanfall was £350-370 range, depending on where you went.
New exclusive = xb1 with no kinect and no game for £350
I'm failing to see the great value. British retailers take after Microsoft with their milking of every penny. There should be a digital copy of a game with the console for £350, and as there isn't many will just wait, or buy a ps4.
they do
high five me ray
Frames equate to performance. Crashes and multiplayer destruction will run smoother at 60fps. Technically its suplementing the mechanics. Btw i have doubts about this game, as in the new 9 minute video, there is a car collision at 6 mins and the cars just bounce off one another.
It does matter. Next gen games cost more. Why should console gamers pay alot more for a game than pc players, when it doesnt perform as well ?
How much of a moron would you need to be when playing this as a kinnect camera is sitting right there ?
Hmmmm it won't be of much use to me if VR requires a 3d television.
PC gamers always trying and take the high ground. The fact is pc needs consoles AAA titles, and consoles do not need pc games. It's as simple as that. By the way those statistics are trash, as they include tablet games as pc sales.
alternatively you can buy ghost recon advanced warfighter for a couple of quid...especially you people who buy this game with the view of coming on and telling everyone how sub standard it is.
They've added the costs of making a new engine, and goodness knows what else as part of this game. As the engine is for all of their new gen games, then it shouldn't be included. Either way, there's no way they have spent that. All part of the hype. People are forgetting the profits get divided. it doesn't even have a SP mode.
This isn't a $500m game. Even if we take into consideration advertising and money for the bribery department and so on, it will come nowhere near that, not American dollars anyway. Of course if your including the graphics engine and so on, which are not Destiny exlusive and will last the next gen for all of their games, then you could throw that in to bump the budget up. They are actually including the cost of the engine, and things that will benefit all their games for years, and not jus...
It's not $500m on one game. It's what they could potentially put on the whole IP if more games were added for sequels/prequels, which will happen.
ps4 version will be slightly bigger because it has exclusive content.
Thanks folks. I'll look to get this now.