The games im anticipating the most are on ps4. I even fired up red dead on the 360, and it looked class. I simply wouldnt want a powerful pc. If i has lots of money the console would stlll be my preference. Games ahead of performance.
How many in multiplayer for next gen ?
I think it is. To me if some people think something matters, then they might think it makes a difference subconciously. I have a Sony kdl, and input lag is so insignificant i don't even use game mode, as cinema to me looks better. To me the most important things are connection to the multiplayer, along with a good smooth refresh rate. A millisecond is a thousandth of a second.
Unless im mistaken, ms stands for milliseconds, and therefore input lag means nothing. Its a gimmick, as the online connection to your game is more important. I have a budget sony bravia 42kdl, and it does the job. Its not as good as good as a pana plasma, but then again not many tvs are.
My experience is that ps plus on ps4 is better than gold for the 360, but as xb1 pretty much copied sonys stategy, then my guess is that theyre pretty much the same between ps4/xb1. In terms of online, fifa sucks equally on both of them, and the experience on battlefield isnt that great between 5-11pm. Lets be honest, they both need to improve, or perhaps its the isps. Oh yeah, psn now will tilt it in sonys favour, if they price it sensibly.
I'd be suprised if they pulled this off. It would be a good move by them. Its a game id consider buying if its priced properly. It didnt go un-noticed that steam players can get it for 25 or 30 bucks.
Me not buying this will be similar to switching the channel
They're not 'made for Americans'. Games are aimed at the most profitable market. It could be argued that Europe have the best developers, and that many of the best games dont revolve around usa. Maybe the yanks have the biggest publishers.
Nice one with youtube if true. Sceptical about the source though, plus im sure ps now was being aimed for 2015 in europe ?
I'm not a fan of a lack of penalty for crashing. It was the same in watch dogs. You shouldn't really just bounce of things you crash into. It does look good though, and i'm considering buying it.
I doubt that there's a great deal of difference. The mechanics and all the things that make the game good will be on all platforms. In terms of graphics, it's not really a ground breaking game anyway. Pre ordering it after playing the alpha.
This is why consoles rule the waves.
The price hasnt dropped. Microsoft still need to pull a few more moves. Im wondering if the money men have decided to not bother as much with games. It just feels to me as if their gloves will never come off. Have they resigned to finishindg 2nd ?
First game sets up the full cycle of the franchise. Its already doing big pre order numbers.
A gameplay trailer with no gameplay. Right ok.
Enjoyed infamous. The game had the wow factor. Ill find out how long this 'new game' lasts before considerin whether to buy it or not.
Enjoying trine and pixeljunk. Strider is more than fine by me. Fab.
It could be, if they shove a $30 store voucher in the box.
Alot of these devs take pride in mechanics and graphics, but they lack plot execution, and some dialougue is very lack lustre. Theyre not street wise enough. Some of the dialogue in battlefield 4 was a joke. These plots need for emotion and verbal ooomphhh.
Yeah it was awesome. I got down voted for asking a question lol.