Hope one of the studios does something more modern day don't know how many more in the future COD's I can take won't be long before we get laser swords in the dlc.
Yeah ive got screwed up images on some articles and blank screens,you got the same?
60 fps would of been the cherry on the cake but im fine with 1080p 30fps I just hope Capcom does a stellar job on the remaster can't wait to see/hear it running in full 1080p in 5.1 surround.
Hope this turns out well love the tv series and a great game to go with it would be sweet.
5 reasons? I can't think of any Resident Evil 2 should definitely get a remake the game was just to good not to and with the news of the RE remaster I have slightly renewed faith that it could possibly happen in the future especially if next year goes well.
More like it from Ms.
In most cases if the games good enough and the story allows it there should always be a sequel,The Last of Us is the perfect example.
@SolidGear3
The original 1996 Resident Evil.
Resident Evil was about 6 hours on average(not taking into account speed runs of 2-3 hours) so 15-20 hours first play through sounds good to me.
I expect more XBOX ass kicking unless Microsoft pull their finger out.
You'd have to be one hell of a Tomb Raider fan to think the answer was yes.
Looks like a knock out to me loved Horizon and very impressed with FH2.
Waste of time and money who's going to jump of the fence for a timed exclusive? why Ms keeps shooting them selves in the foot with these back alley deals and not focus on new exclusives with their cash which would be more likely to sell XB1's will remain a mystery.
I own both consoles but do we need a future where Ms/Sony fight to buy up 3rd parties? I don't think we do.(expect Sony to hit back on this one at some point)
I don't see this as a way to improve the fan/player base which is what Microsoft's intentions should be,I see this back firing like an old Skoda.
It's one of the only ways MS has of getting back in the game I see it happening a lot this gen but that's not to say I agree with it because I don't 3rd parties should remain neutral unless MS/SONY have pumped money into their game which would justify it being an exclusive/timed exclusive but in all honesty Microsoft should put their money to better use like Sony have done over the years.(exclusives sell consoles not timed exclusives)
I'll be to busy playing it to watch.
It's just the grieving process of mostly those who want the game but won't be playing it for what ever reason and most people believe the best defence is to attack,not the best side of gaming but it's how it is.
Thought it was only Nintendo that got this treatment.
I see it only being ok when you help develop the game other than that leave it on neutral ground let everyone which ever platform they game on enjoy the title though in the case of Tomb Raider I can see what they were thinking in terms of a timed exclusive deal if it's going directly up against Uncharted 4.