Not really a good argument.. that’s the Genetic fallacy.
Stick to the content, not the creator or source.
Not at all. Even the logo for PS5 had people talking for days longer than people talking about Xbox’s Specs.
Remember that time Sony did a sidebyside loading time for Spiderman? Yeah. .THAT happened.
BC messaging wasn’t a fiasco, it was simply miscommunication (miscommunication goes both ways).
Xbox One messaging between E3 and launch date was completely different.
“large deficits”... What metric is “large” in this context? What comparison are you using to make this type of comment?
There isn’t confusing messaging whatsoever.
I agree with all 3.
And 4. many Developers were prioritizing their games on PS4 than Xbox..PS4 had alot of marketing deals.
I’m excited for a system that is quite more ‘powerful’ than PS4.. I’m excited for essentially no bottlenecks.. insanely fast load times.. and an very interesting new audio technology.
“Far less powerful console”...
It’s like what? 14% less ‘powerful’ on paper? The Xbox One/PS4 difference was 2-3 times that much.
Dropped the ball?
What ball exactly? The deep dive that would have originally been for GDC, a DEVELOPERS conference? Nope.
If GDC happened, We would still have some ‘leaked’ news about some features, but nothing would be entirely confirmed.. Sony would have been hush about the project still.
Should they be more vocal???? No. They can officially reveal the system and everything along with it when they are ready.. they are the Market Le...
PS for the win
What is there really to criticize that warrants criticism?
@Chief.
No. What I'm saying is PS5 (base) is almost better than XBSX (high end), which is saying something. XBSX fanboys think they are comparable when they are not because one is base and the other is High end. It makes XBSX looks bad.
The only way for Xbox to compete was to put out a high end console and PS5 wasn't even worried. PS5 will come out on top as the base and Lockhart (base) will be laughed off the market. It's really quite pathe...
@rainslacker
It's a marketing strategy.
Why release or announce the weaker console that is comparable to the PS4 Pro as a "next gen" console when it's significantly worse than the PS5? Obviously they are using their high end device to compete with PS5 bc their baseline "next gen" console can't compete with it.
So Phil said there could be multiple consoles but Lockhart is still just a rumor? Lol.
https://kotaku.com/sources-...
Lol it's not a rumor tho. Phil has spoken of Lockhart.
Lockhart is more comparable to PS5.
Nice back pedal.
Series S is Project Lockhart
Yeah. Xbox’s are generally more ‘powerful’ but Playstation have had better games.
It’s literally players playing pixels vs playing games.
Also, isn't there a Series S version being released as well?
Series S should be compared to PS5. Not Series X. Fanboys will try their hardest to feel good about a piece of plastic.
Yeah. The past 3 console gens MS has never ‘won’ a generation. Must be REALLY sad for them to cling to the hype of the POWAH of their console.