@Tybe
You actually made me chuckle. Well done, sir.
I'm very fortunate, though. I've never bought an ms console, so I've never been burnt by them. My perspective is that of an outsider looking in. I still have a bias, but I can be a lot more objective than someone that's invested thousands of dollars and hours into their consoles.
My prediction is that MS is going to show games that are expected to release WAAAY into the future. The accurate narrative of xbox "has no games" has been a strong talking point in the past, but after the cancellation of scalebound that's all you ever hear now when discussing the xbone, and rightly so. MS are well aware of this and will do anything the can at E3, whether it be slight manipulations of truth to bold face lies, to counter that narrative.
They wil...
Are GameStop being paid to write such tripe?
Nintendo haven't learnt a single fking thing from the wii U and GS think it could eclipse the original wii?
smh.
Do you know why you're the worst, Septic?
Because you keep pointing out other fanboys when you're the biggest fanboy on this site.
I guess when you've been tricked 3 times by MS, and by that I mean it's halfway through the generation and MS have once again basically stopped bringing out any exclusives, and with the exclusive situation on the xbone being the worst it's ever been since MS entered the console market, it's really messe...
Shhhhh.... You'll destroy their fragile narrative and they'll get angry again.
Great argument refuting all my points.
The release of Zelda has really opened up my eyes. Nintendo fanboys are the absolute worst.
Good day, sir.
No.
What's amazing is people ignoring the blatant double standard from those reviewers marking down other games for the same flaws Zelda gets a complete pass on. The list of flaws has already been well documented so I'm not going to repeat myself.
I'm not saying EVERY single reviewer had bias nostalgia goggles when playing the game, but to say that isn't even a possibility is beyond pathetic, let along attacking anyone that makes the accus...
No.
What's amazing are people calling zelda a perfect game that sets the standard of the genre without playing horizon.
Maybe because nintendo fanbabies keep flooding the same hyperbolic articles spreading their blind zealotry and attacking anyone for suggesting zelda isn't a perfect game.
Just take this article for example. Zelda has now set the standard for the genre? After all it's flaws? It's beyond a joke at this point.
Always the same, every article that speaks highly of BoTW we get tons of blindly fanatical comments that have the stupid notion that pointing out the games obvious flaws and double standard reviews means you're a hater.
Maybe they're just calling a spade a spade.
Stay blind and aggressive people.
I agree.
For more than a decade now, most RPGs have voiced dialogue in most instances. Zelda barely does that, it's in different a league alright... below everyone else, in that area of production at least.
And your point about ferrari's hasn't proved against my point of double standards.
I can just say Horizon is a faster, better built ferrari, but this reviewer over here took points away because of the windshield smudge. H...
I really hope other devs don't try to copy it, because then I'd have poor frame rate, tedious inventory management and breaking weapons, no anti-aliasing, simple combat and lack of enemy variety to name a few.
RPGs are my fav genre, so I really hope devs don't do that.
No.
What's pathetic are nintedo fanboys denying the double standards in so many reviews.
Anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can plainly see the double standard.
It's amazing that anyone could deny it.
It's official, nintendo fanboys are the worst.
I used to think ms fanboys were the worst, but the special brand of arrogant smugness, zealotry and rabid blind aggression to anyone that points out zelda's legitimate flaws, that points out the obvious double standard from reviewers, that suggest that maybe, just maybe, it's not a perfect game that can cure cancer while you play is... difficult to comprehend.
I literally haven't seen this lev...
Maybe you could explain to me how those "reputable" reviewers gave zelda a free pass on it's flaws that other games from the same outlet get marked down for?
Very well said.
The double standard is so blatant and obvious it's amazing that anyone could deny it. All I keep hearing from a certain group is "hurr durr! Metacritic is gospel! Hur durrrrr!"
Maybe because nin fanboys get so upset when someone points out the games legitimate flaws and needs to make it clear it is NOT a perfect game.
And it's clear a lot of the perfect 10s are from bias reviewers.
Are we suppose to just ignore the glaring issues because EA took into consideration the genitalia of a person in the hiring process?
Here's the thing a lot of people don't seem to notice. And for ms fans alarm bells should be ringing. (To be honest they should have be ringing a long time ago)
As little power as phil has at ms, he is one of the few people that can actually fix the problem. He should not be saying "I'd like to see...", instead he should be saying "I see the problem and I will do something about it".
What he just said implies he isn't g...