i think you have had enough magic mushrooms
1200 points for a last gen xbox game is too much.
I can buy the game 2nd hand for cheaper and have a disc.
Also, my 360 only has a 20gb drive which i can only fit 2 - 3 games on
Resistance & killzone, maybe
but saying metal gear can't compete is something i don't agree with
i loved the battlefield series on pc, but this one is the worst one i have played.
24 players is not enough for a battlefield game
they are identical.
and both very average imo.
Once again the cars have no sense of weight.
very poor handling, graphics are ok, crashes are cool (except for the stupid flashback feature)
im seeing a lot of people in denial about how average this game really is.
don't get swept along by hype, make you own decision.
You do not have to like a game just because its hyped.
7/10 for me, its just not as good as it should have been.
achievments can extend a games life, but ultimately they are pointless.
There is always someone out there with less of a life who will have a better gamer score than you.
a gamer score is no indication of skill either, my boss has double my score and i still kick his ass on most games.
but i can understand why a lot of people are tired of them.
i would not mind playing another dday landing scene if the game i am playing is well made and pushes the boundries for how realistic a game can be (graphics, physics, number of on screen characters, etc).
it is when they bring a game out every year with only minor improvements that people get bored. (imo)
agreed, i played the demo last night and it is awful.
nice graphics though
i thought that was confirmed a while back
perhaps i was too harsh.
im just sick of all the my console is better than yours crap (i have 360, pc & ps3 btw).
just play the games and enjoy them
im loving the comments from uneducated fools.
neither console can run a game with full effects at 1080p.
gt prologue is 1080p but quiter clearly has no AA.
Only a pc can run intensive games at 1080p and beyond, but they are very expensive.
I have been a pc gamer for over 15 years and know a lot more than most of the people that posted comments above.
Tamd, bea arthur & capt chaos - you guys clearly know a thing or ...
it was not perfect and you could not skip the cut scenes, but the multiplayer was solid and supported more players than infinity ward could manage! (24 for those who never played it)
and its only about £15 cheaper than a quad
At least someone had the balls to say what we were all thinking.
Can't believe you didn't get disagrees from those swept along by the hype.
This game is a step forward visually, but a huge leap backwards in content.
I actually enjoyed saints row better than gta4, you had more freedom and you could rob any shop you wanted.
mass efect was boring anyway,
the citadel home to 5 billion people, but you can only talk to 5.
not enough people or places to interact with for my tastes
the graphics are good but the handling is very arcadey.
i will be giving this one a miss
i lost faith in this game when i discovered it uses the cm dirt engine.
hopefully the demo will change my mind.
Pc farcry = excellent
console farcry = terrible
farcry 2 is made by the people that made the console version of fc1. im no going to get my hopes up about it.