What shot did he take?
Wow. WTF is everyones problem? A person who works for a company that made a game who's multiplayer didn't work on launch is concerned that a developer may release a game who's multiplayer doesn't work properly at launch. How is this far fetched? Someone experiences something then is worried that it could be repeated by someone else. It makes PERFECT FUCKING SENSE.
Nice graphics-very far from photo realistic that they were touted to be-but still nice.
A few of the zombies in one picture all have the same wounds on their faces/heads.
Naw. The 360 wasn't weak like the xbone and they still didn't release Halo 3 for the pc
it's been 7 years since halo 3 was released for the 360, it seems like it's now long after that was released, where is the pc version?
It already is, so is Halo 2.
I know right! He's so selfish for letting the trolls win. In a way he's the troll.... no wait That's you.
You don't know anything about his personal life so you should keep your judgements to yourself.
I wonder what makes it a doom 2 remake as apposed to a doom remake?
They'd kind of have to be tough to go through the things they've gone through.
I wonder what they mean by "difficulty in reading the environment in order to appreciate the gameplay"
What do you mean "Who won E3? E3 ain't ova yet.
It could be considered fake if the person "reviewing" hasn't played the game or hasn't played the completed gold version of the game. To be clear, I have no idea what the story is here.
whaaaaaat?? Of course they can! Unless you're blind then of course they can't!
In F.E.A.R. I remember noticing a difference between 30 and 40, so I think it's safe to say the difference between 30 and 60 is noticeable if not blindingly obvious.
They're still throwing money into that?
lol. why?
Why can't it be both?
Yes. Very easily.
An older game logically SHOULD be more stable than a new one.