It is.
Not really. It's quite expensive, if you ask me. However, I'm still getting one.
Ube Boll :-P?
$600 for a PS3 which you bought, all the way. :-/
That doesn't make sense. Because Halo 3 has nothing to do with this story.
You don't make any sense.
Incredible...
Famitsu said otherwise, asshole. - http://thexboxdomain.net/20...
"because one consoles first party looks better than the other which would not suit their agenda. "
That's your opinion.
Because Microsoft and Sony don't have the same first party titles?
WOW! Really lucky throw.
Errr... most people can't afford the damn thing?
Why are Sony the bad guys, you ask? Because they said rumble was "last-gen".
Epic doesn't waste it's time with gimmicks. They rather have the latest hardware to work with (X360, PS3 & PC), not something from "yester-year".
Why aren't you attacking nasim as well, Cheech?
"PS3 will leave the 360 standing when it comes to storage space for game. lol"
...
Assuming any developer takes advantage of the extra storage space. Which most WON'T, meaning 3rd parties in general. Why? Because 3rd parties have nothing to gain by adding extra content in one version over another (PS3 vs 360).
However, this is only GOOD news for first party Sony game developers who have financial means to take advantage of the extra stora...
They have no experience with shooters. American developers are way better at that.
They're not having problems. Denis Dyack (SP?) is just saying that the Unreal Engine 3 isn't doing what it was supposed to do as advertised. According to him, anyway.
It's a good game, relax.
Not all of us have money for a $5,000 PC, so...