Games that you can't share, sure.
It always strikes me in a strange way that the world wide sales postings are so quiet in comparison to the regional sales postings. Is there something offensive about total sales that I am missing?
Was kassler's sarcasm that hard to read?
I suppose we could focus on the TV aspect. However, that is not where the outrage is. The Xbox One being an expensive TV tuner/remote is great for those wanting to watch a lot of TV. The Xbox One being at the forefront of a new level of consumer control in the console gaming arena is worth the outrage. Xbox Live Gold was outrageous when it was introduced with a fee, but it worked. People fell asleep and love it. Now Microsoft is adding more fees and control. Try not to fall for it again, guys...
That is a very Microsoft friendly article. They even glossed over the "I hope they do" answer to the always online question.
Everyone can see this very clearly. Microsoft prefers an audience that isn't yet defined. The audience that supported them for the past 8 years is no more important than an audience that doesn't exist yet.
They always say that E3 is about the games. The fans always fall for it. Then a dance party breaks out on the stage at E3, Kinect games fall from the heavens, and a brand new package of apps sprout up.
Let's be real about this. Microsoft is playing with your head.
From what we've just seen. . .
I would prefer Sony monopolizing core gaming. They seem to be the only company still concerned with core gaming anyway. Microsoft has been exploiting core console gamers since the beginning of 360. The "competition" from Microsoft is detrimental. A new competitor should enter the fray.
Wouldn't real tracks be the biggest draw for someone looking for "realistic racing"?
It's seven NEW tracks. . . Addtional. . . Added to. . . Why are some of you so confused by the wording?
33 tracks. 71 layouts.
Everyone knows Nintendo was the first.
Hit pause. Use your rotary phone to call a pizza place. Wait 30 minutes or less. Best app ever.
Meanwhile, I can maintain my Starbucks habit AND play online while spending the same amount of money. Methinks that's a win for the home team!
"like i said, sony isn't bullsh1tting around, there bringing there a game."
I read this as:
I'm saying something, something bringing. . . Look! There is a game walking past!
I get the point, but punctuation is a hell of a drug.
Back in the day. . . CoD4. . .
Kids these days.
I was amazing on the PSOne. They lost the magic on the PS2 and ceased to exist.
Are you gloating about an old rumor being false due to a new rumor? Fair enough. Gloat away.
That would be a bad business move on QD's part. If someone paid me to do my own thing I'd be highly resistant to a buy out.
Aww! Sorry guys. I'm sure no one meant to upset you with this article. Maybe stay in the "We like our relationship with Microsoft" articles? Do those exist? Maybe you two can type one up!
And since Obama's ratings are fairly high (especially compared to Bush)... What's the point again?
They weren't all replaced. Where did you get that info from?
He must not be interested in games at all.
I feel the same way, FlameAlchemist. I game share with my PS3s and can't fathom having to pay extra for my son to play online with me.
If either system blocks game sharing and used games in any way. . . Ahoy me mateys!