It would've been better if Batman had had fabulous quality control before his latest game was released.
What do you think now?
Don't be naive. When a company starts publicly noting the obstacles to making a product before that product has been released on the market, you know there are going to be problems.
And that's exactly what happened here.
Working on a patch is the least that they could do. WB Montreal should give a partial refund of $20 to every single person who documents a bug with them. You earned it for being one of their "gamma" testers.
This just looks like "Silent Hill 2" with current generation graphics. And without the atmosphere.
Already laying the groundwork for mediocre reviews, methinks.
They're also all target demographic buyers for H&M. Perhaps shopping at H&M and buying their shitty clothing is the reason that people become unhinged and go on murderous shooting sprees.
Yup. That's about it.
I did think of someone else, though: Ronald Moore.
Has anyone with less talent and creativity ever been more full of themselves than Abrams? I doubt it.
@-Foxtrot
Not just sun cream, either.
Just sayin'.
Sure, he could've done better. He could've given her a slightly better ass.
I've always been a leg-and-ass man, m'self.
Kee-rist.
If true, my guess--hope, really--is that the release date is being pushed back to allow them to make a simultaneous release of a standard bundle and a "Kinectless" bundle.
No. That "honor" belongs to Dragon Age II.
From the interview:
"CVG: A quick word on Kinect - I presume there will never be an Xbox One sold without it. You are doing this for developer-related reasons as much as your own. You want all developers to know that they can always implement Kinect technology because it always comes with every system. Would that be correct?
Phil Harrison: Correct. Xbox One is Kinect. They are not separate systems. An Xbox One has chips, it has memory, it has Blu-ray, it...
Ah ha ha haaaa!
Now I know that I can wait for the Kinect-less version at $100 less.
Thanks for being civil; I'll take that gentlemen's wager. : )
I wouldn't put too much stock in what Microsoft is restating. They've "restated" quite a lot since they officially announced the Xbox One.
So now they want me to pay an extra hundred dollars for an accessory that I will NEVER use and that I can disconnect? Even though they originally said that it was part of the console's "architecture" and necessary for the console to function?
I call bullshit.
I also have a prediction: Microsoft will release a "Kinect-less" Xbox One for $399 before the end of the year. They're laying the groundwork for it right now with press re...
What would be the story for a sequel? The game had a definite end.
I'd add "Mass Effect 3" to your list.
"Let me make something crystal clear: all the negative features that landed Microsoft such bad press have been overturned."
Actually, that's incorrect. Microsoft have continued to receive bad press over the force-placed Kinect and consumers like me will not spend an extra $100 for an accessory we have no intention of using.
If Microsoft does not release a "Kinectless" version of the Xbone at a correspondingly lower price, that will ce...