Either way
....
It’s what I call dynamism; basically, the way the city reacts to you, we are able to push further on the Xbox One"
He doesn't specifically mention being online
Conflicting = meaningless
The concept is there ... not much else though
@callahan09
"Every gaming rig uses GDDR5. All of them."
ORLY!?
They include one - built-in with Kinect.
How well the noise-cancelation, and having everyone using it will work out has yet to be seen...
And as of now using Kinect as a mic is lousy (to listen to at least - lots of livingroom noises, and echoy voices)
Nevermind having voices coming out of your TV!!! MS should be able to tell that an overwhelming majority of people turn that shit OFF as of now. (with the headset, headset/tv, tv only options - idk...
oops
I'm a xbox fan, and even bigger Bungie fan...
Atm, I'd say it's safe to assume so.
The Verdict was "nay"?
The question was: will the xbox one suck?
...
So, nay, the xbox one won't suck?
Maybe it's his ... destiny?
Dogs!
(com'on, someone was gonna say it)
:( I typed ... beliebable :(
Couldn't the same be said about any of their more recent games..?
Red Dead's MP will be "very different" than GTA IV's MP.... (same could be said with Max PAyne)
So basically all they are saying is GTA V's MP will resemble more of our latest titles MP, than GTA IV. (an older title of theirs)
While not entirely unbeliebable, i think they'll make it so you can do said hiests in freeroam, (with three friends in the respective online-avatar)
R* is cruel like that
See, I see it as they gave him the bad image.
And when a company asks a high-ranking exec to essentially bad-mouth his own reputation, they pay him upfront and provide him with a backup job waiting.
Mattrick was still on the red carpet telling kids to sticking with 360s by the time Microsoft was having backroom meeting about their 180.
If anything, the bad image for MS was Mattrick being a little spiteful, as if "if you you guys [M...
I personally think Mattrick's move was his decision, cause he is probably pissed at Microsoft.
He only says what he's told (he's allowed) to say. It's not his fault that he was reading from Script-A all while Microsoft had a reversal plan. (Of which he wasn't allowed to read from)
It makes him look terribly misinformed. And Microsoft is using him as a bad-PR sponge.
It must be incredibly difficult to officially comment to ...
Nah, I'm a big xbox fan. The layouts are actually different.
If Sony removing it from the bundle is good, then that should automatically make your opinion that Microsft bundling it be bad.
But you're saying it's actually good, because it means the device that you were intially happy to not have bundled will actually have better functionality.
The contradiction pivots around you not wanting the PS Eye - admittely, something you never actually said.
I always respect authors who will discus...
The author is basically saying Microsoft bundling the Kinect is a blessing in disguise because it assures the PS Eye - a device that Sony thankfully made optiona cause one wants motion controls - will get support?
Isn't that like a contradiction upon a contradiction?
You mean this article?
http://www.nowgamer.com/new...
Where he still says:
"It’s what I call dynamism; basically, the way the city reacts to you, we are able to push further on the Xbox One.”