No, sort of like a mini high-intensity weapon that fires hypersonic speed projectiles in an instant.
Damn, carrying a gauss-type weapon around is going to be insane and sort of reminds me of the days of quake.
Hmm, not really if you think about it. Attractive price point and a good deal.
I really didn't care much for what time period, I just wanted and want a new game engine that looks the day.
@below: Of course I care about gameplay/features, but if there's on thing I've learned from Treyarch judging from Black Ops 2 is that they're full of crazy ideas such as wager matches, especially gun game and one in a chamber so I'm not really concerned about game feature when they're at the helm. But right now, a new game engine that screams...
This is bigger than xbox vs ps3 and all you can do is think about the console wars?
You're always on these type of articles spreading your hate for MS and showering nothing but love for all others. I'm afraid you really have to wake up, ply your eyes open and clear your head of all that bias floating around, and see the bigger picture. This isn't just about moto vs ms. It never was, and if moto is to win this case, all the players in the industry, including customers, would be at a loss.
Though, it's highly unlikely you won't conside...
Yes, well, FRAND patents should be licensed at a steady cost to all companies who wish to use the patent. Charging a ridiculous $4 bn annually while others get to pay a reasonable amount more in line with FRAND rules of charging reasonable terms is certainly not fair.
Besides, if Moto wins this one in the US, they surely will go after all others to attain larger fees from all, especially Apple. So, this case just isn't between Moto-Google and MS, it's Moto-Google vs...
Yes, it says it in the title. :/
"xbox is not that big in eu??"
20+ million users right behind ps3's number of users isn't considered "big?"
edit: how am I dissing you? I'm simply giving you a user number in reply to your claims. But I do agree the patent system is screwed up and should be completely reformed.
edit: "sony own eu and asia xbox own the usa so keep calm and go away"...
Honestly, I hope Europe finds Motorola abusing their FRAND patents this time, this is getting just ridiculous. Charging nearly 4bn dollars annually for FRAND patents, how could anyone have expected MS to actually comply with those terms.
Sure, they have to pay a dollar figure, but aren't FRAND patents under law to be charged with reasonable terms? 4bn annually does not sound reasonable to me.
Or just reform the damn patent system, it's getting to t...
I'm sorry but those faces in the trailer didn't look very realistic.
I really don't want to buy into the hype again only to feel disappointed when the game come out, but the premise is certainly interesting for a Call of Duty game.
Another great review, this game deserves it.
Wow, those graphics look...bad for a 2012 game.
So, you've played it, then?
Yeah, same here, unfortunately.
I'm more interested in Spartan Ops. New missions that draws influence from sci-fi hits such as Battlestar Galactica with cutscenes every week...and it's FREE. That's pretty awesome, in my opinion.
I'm interested, but I'm not planning on buying this one.
I'm interested, but I just can't spend another $60 on another Call of Duty title again...until they completely upgrade their engine to something more in line with today's standards.
If they're upgrading their tech for a futuristic setting, why not their actual game tech since they sell millions of copies per year?
Lol..
Hmm..I actually think Call of Duty 4 was the most ambitious.