Exactly what I was thinking. If someone does a comparison they should put the pictures side by side not just throw a ton of random pictures in the article and let you figure out which picture is from which game.
a 6 scale.........how original.
Yeah, this isn't impressive. I remember the first time I've seen Onimusha for the PS2 before the PS2 was out, I couldn't believe my eyes.
Same thing when I've seen Resistance 1 and heavenly sword before the PS3 was out. I couldn't believe that they could pull off graphics like that and physics as well. This looks like an unpolished PS3-Xbox360 game.
Hahahahahahaha.....
....love stories about stupid people.
Sadly I have to wait till the 25th but in the mean time I got Uncharted 3 and BF3 to keep me busy.
Doesn't work???
Well CONGRATULATIONS to you! Activision managed to find a way to squeeze out another $50 from you for features that should be in the game to begin with.
Have to be a special kind of person in order to buy this "service".
I admit I didn't know that. Thank you very much! Just learned something new today.
Bubbles up!
CoD sniping is worthless. It's not sniping. He should not talk about Battlefield's sniping because it walks all over CoD so called "sniping".
In BF, you have to take gravity into account as well. You can't shoot 500m and expect to hit your target when he is right in the center of your scope. In CoD, you can because there is no gravity pulling down your bullet. It just goes into eternity.
@buddymagoo
I think Paper Mario is very different from Mario Galaxy, don't you think so???
As for FIFA, I only buy a FIFA game every 5 years because by than there are noticeable differences. But CoD have not changed AT ALL since CoD4. Maybe different modes or "new guns" and new maps but it's the same exact thing over and over again. I agree with the saying which is "what's not broken don't fix it" but also "What'...
It's a terrible CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!! :D
I was joking, just to be clear on that.
@darthv72
First off, this article IS about the graphics and not the gameplay. I'm sure it's the same exact game and can be enjoyed the same exact way but we aren't talking about that.
Did I ever say that all I care about is graphics??? No, I did not. So how did you came up with the idea that I stop in an online match to look around and admire the graphics is beyond me.
But, we don't have to worry about that because I won'...
You mean the MGS HD collections???? :D
Well said!!
Besides, we got BF3.
To answer the question at hand; I won't be getting it. BF3 is more than enough and a better choice. I'm kind of tired of playing the same thing since CoD4.
I can't tell if a 7.5 score is right for the game because I'm very early in the Syria level so I need to finish the game first but so far it's pretty damn impressive.
4/10 is outrageous however. 7.5 isn't a bad score at all. This is one persons opinion and everyone is different.
As for twisting peoples opinions of a game.....well if you are influenced by a review so much than you aren't a real gamer is what I got to tell you. Everyone sho...
Actually, the 360 version has way better lighting. The 360 version has way better everything.
The PS3 version looks like that there is a constant fog. Looks washed out. Shame that after all these years they can't make the two versions look equal.
The PS3 version does.
CoD always looked worst on PS3 for some reason. But they still didn't figure out how to make them look equal after all these years. It's like they are making CoD on the PS3 for the first time.
I'm a PS3 gamer myself but in this case PS3 is the clear looser. Terrible lighting and those jaggies are painful.
RAP and medieval/viking things don't really mix well in my book.
A heavy metal song or a great orchestra would suit this game much better.
You mean 2007.
7.6 huh??
Waiting to see what other sites will give it.
Unloyal money grubbing tactic from Activison???? NO!! Definitely not Activision!!!! Just look how original MW3 is!! They definitely went all out making this game.
/sarcasm.